Quantitative Biology > Neurons and Cognition
[Submitted on 12 Jan 2020 (v1), revised 7 Feb 2020 (this version, v2), latest version 28 Feb 2021 (v3)]
Title:A technical critique of the free energy principle as presented in "Life as we know it" and related works
View PDFAbstract:We summarize the argument in Friston (2013, this https URL) and highlight some technical errors. We also discuss how these errors affect the very similar Friston (2014, this https URL) and, where appropriate, mention consequences for the newer proposals in Friston (2019, arXiv:1906.10184v1 ) and Parr et al. (2019, this https URL). The errors call into question the purported interpretation that the internal coordinates of every system with a Markov blanket will appear to engage in Bayesian inference. In particular, in addition to highlighting the implicit restriction to linear models, we identify three formal errors in the main argument of Friston (2013): The first concerns the rewriting of the equations of motion of systems with Markov blankets which turns out not to be generally correct. We prove the non-equivalence with a counterexample that exhibits a Markov blanket but does not satisfy the rewritten equations. Our counterexample also invalidates the corresponding (but more general) rewritten equations in the more recent Friston (2019). The second error concerns the Free Energy Lemma itself, which we prove, by counterexample, to be wrong in general. The third is the claim that the Free Energy Lemma, when it does hold, implies equality of variational density and ergodic conditional density. The interpretation in terms of Bayesian inference hinges on this point, and we hence conclude that it is unjustified. Additionally, we highlight that the definitions of the Markov blanket in Friston (2013) and Parr et al. (2019) are not equivalent and that the assumptions in Parr et al. (2019) may be too strong to allow for meaningful interpretation.
Submission history
From: Martin Biehl [view email][v1] Sun, 12 Jan 2020 06:27:23 UTC (17 KB)
[v2] Fri, 7 Feb 2020 05:51:01 UTC (23 KB)
[v3] Sun, 28 Feb 2021 20:27:20 UTC (35 KB)
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.