Quantitative Biology > Neurons and Cognition
[Submitted on 12 Jan 2020 (this version), latest version 28 Feb 2021 (v3)]
Title:A technical critique of the free energy principle as presented in "Life as we know it"
View PDFAbstract:We summarize the argument in Friston (2013, this https URL) and highlight some technical errors. We also discuss how these errors affect the similar Friston (2014, this https URL). The errors call into question the purported interpretation that the internal coordinates of every system with a Markov blanket will appear to engage in Bayesian inference. In particular, we identify three formal errors in the main argument of Friston (2013): The first concerns the rewriting of the equations of motion of systems with Markov blankets which turns out not to be equivalent. We prove the non-equivalence with a counterexample that exhibits a Markov blanket but does not satisfy the rewritten equations. Our counterexample also invalidates the corresponding (but more general) rewritten equations in the more recent Friston (2019, arXiv:1906.10184v1 ). The second error is the lack of a proof of the existence of the free energy as claimed by the Free Energy Lemma. The third is the assumption that a non-negative function whose gradient vanishes at some point necessarily has a minimum at that point and that its value at this minimum is zero. However, if the function is constant, which is the case here, its gradient vanishes everywhere, it has no minimum at any point, and its value can be arbitrarily large. The interpretation in terms of Bayesian inference hinges on this point, and we hence conclude that it is unjustified.
Submission history
From: Martin Biehl [view email][v1] Sun, 12 Jan 2020 06:27:23 UTC (17 KB)
[v2] Fri, 7 Feb 2020 05:51:01 UTC (23 KB)
[v3] Sun, 28 Feb 2021 20:27:20 UTC (35 KB)
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.