Mathematics > Optimization and Control
[Submitted on 9 Dec 2015 (v1), revised 4 Jan 2016 (this version, v3), latest version 12 Nov 2018 (v14)]
Title:Restarted SGD: Beating SGD without Smoothness and/or Strong Convexity
View PDFAbstract:In this paper, we show that a restarted stochastic (sub)gradient {\bf d}escent (RSGD) can find an $\epsilon$-optimal solution for a broad class of non-smooth and/or non-strongly convex optimization problems with a lower iteration complexity than vanilla stochastic subgradient descent (SGD). Of foremost interest, we show that for non-smooth and non-strongly convex optimization, RSGD reduces the dependence of SGD's iteration complexity on the distance of initial solution to the optimal set to the dependence on the maximum distance of points in the $\epsilon$-level set to the optimal set. This result of RSGD for non-smooth and non-strongly convex problems complements the previous work~\cite{arXiv:1510.01444} that establishes a linear convergence rate for RSGD for a special family of non-smooth and non-strongly convex optimization problems whose epigraph is a polyhedron. Besides that, we also obtain some interesting results of RSGD for locally semi-strongly convex problems and smooth optimization problems that have a Łojasiewicz property. In particular, (i) for locally semi-strongly convex functions, RSGD has an $O(\frac{1}{\epsilon}\log(\frac{1}{\epsilon}))$ iteration complexity, which in the strongly convex scenario is similar to if not better than that of SGD; (ii) for smooth optimization problems that have a Łojasiewicz property with a power constant of $\beta\in(0,1)$, RSGD~\footnote{In this case, RSGD refers to restarted stochastic gradient descent.} has an $O(\frac{1}{\epsilon^{2\beta}}\log(\frac{1}{\epsilon}))$ iteration complexity, which is better that that of SGD for such smooth optimization problems whose iteration complexity is $O(\frac{1}{\epsilon^2})$. The novelty of our analysis lies at exploiting the lower bound of the subgradient or gradient of the objection function at the $\epsilon$-level set.
Submission history
From: Tianbao Yang [view email][v1] Wed, 9 Dec 2015 22:58:21 UTC (58 KB)
[v2] Sun, 13 Dec 2015 23:40:38 UTC (165 KB)
[v3] Mon, 4 Jan 2016 20:36:11 UTC (165 KB)
[v4] Tue, 5 Jan 2016 03:33:59 UTC (165 KB)
[v5] Wed, 3 Feb 2016 05:56:29 UTC (262 KB)
[v6] Mon, 29 Feb 2016 05:37:18 UTC (264 KB)
[v7] Fri, 4 Mar 2016 23:57:06 UTC (264 KB)
[v8] Tue, 5 Apr 2016 03:40:59 UTC (265 KB)
[v9] Wed, 4 May 2016 04:07:35 UTC (277 KB)
[v10] Thu, 23 Jun 2016 05:08:01 UTC (277 KB)
[v11] Thu, 11 Aug 2016 23:09:32 UTC (172 KB)
[v12] Tue, 29 Nov 2016 06:12:35 UTC (174 KB)
[v13] Wed, 18 Apr 2018 20:57:48 UTC (206 KB)
[v14] Mon, 12 Nov 2018 05:23:28 UTC (206 KB)
Current browse context:
math.OC
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.