Mathematics > Optimization and Control
[Submitted on 9 Dec 2015 (v1), last revised 12 Nov 2018 (this version, v14)]
Title:RSG: Beating Subgradient Method without Smoothness and Strong Convexity
View PDFAbstract:In this paper, we study the efficiency of a {\bf R}estarted {\bf S}ub{\bf G}radient (RSG) method that periodically restarts the standard subgradient method (SG). We show that, when applied to a broad class of convex optimization problems, RSG method can find an $\epsilon$-optimal solution with a lower complexity than the SG method. In particular, we first show that RSG can reduce the dependence of SG's iteration complexity on the distance between the initial solution and the optimal set to that between the $\epsilon$-level set and the optimal set {multiplied by a logarithmic factor}. Moreover, we show the advantages of RSG over SG in solving three different families of convex optimization problems. (a) For the problems whose epigraph is a polyhedron, RSG is shown to converge linearly. (b) For the problems with local quadratic growth property in the $\epsilon$-sublevel set, RSG has an $O(\frac{1}{\epsilon}\log(\frac{1}{\epsilon}))$ iteration complexity. (c) For the problems that admit a local Kurdyka-Łojasiewicz property with a power constant of $\beta\in[0,1)$, RSG has an $O(\frac{1}{\epsilon^{2\beta}}\log(\frac{1}{\epsilon}))$ iteration complexity. The novelty of our analysis lies at exploiting the lower bound of the first-order optimality residual at the $\epsilon$-level set. It is this novelty that allows us to explore the local properties of functions (e.g., local quadratic growth property, local Kurdyka-Łojasiewicz property, more generally local error bound conditions) to develop the improved convergence of RSG. { We also develop a practical variant of RSG enjoying faster convergence than the SG method, which can be run without knowing the involved parameters in the local error bound condition.} We demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed algorithms on several machine learning tasks including regression, classification and matrix completion.
Submission history
From: Tianbao Yang [view email][v1] Wed, 9 Dec 2015 22:58:21 UTC (58 KB)
[v2] Sun, 13 Dec 2015 23:40:38 UTC (165 KB)
[v3] Mon, 4 Jan 2016 20:36:11 UTC (165 KB)
[v4] Tue, 5 Jan 2016 03:33:59 UTC (165 KB)
[v5] Wed, 3 Feb 2016 05:56:29 UTC (262 KB)
[v6] Mon, 29 Feb 2016 05:37:18 UTC (264 KB)
[v7] Fri, 4 Mar 2016 23:57:06 UTC (264 KB)
[v8] Tue, 5 Apr 2016 03:40:59 UTC (265 KB)
[v9] Wed, 4 May 2016 04:07:35 UTC (277 KB)
[v10] Thu, 23 Jun 2016 05:08:01 UTC (277 KB)
[v11] Thu, 11 Aug 2016 23:09:32 UTC (172 KB)
[v12] Tue, 29 Nov 2016 06:12:35 UTC (174 KB)
[v13] Wed, 18 Apr 2018 20:57:48 UTC (206 KB)
[v14] Mon, 12 Nov 2018 05:23:28 UTC (206 KB)
Current browse context:
math.OC
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.