arXiv:physics/9711018v2 [physics.acc-ph] 20 Nov 1997

A superconductive undulator with period length of 3.8 mm

T. Hezel, B. Krevet1, H. O. Moser, J. A. Rossmanith2, R. Rossmanith3, Th. Schneider4

Projektgruppe Errichtung ANKA, Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe, P. O. Box 3640,

D-76021 Karlsruhe, Germany

Corresponding author: hezel@anka.fzk.de; Fax: ++49 7247 82 6172

1Institut für Mikrostrukturtechnik, Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe, D-76021 Karlsruhe, Germany

2Christopher Newport University, Newport News, Virginia, USA

3DESY/Hasylab, D-22605 Hamburg, Germany

4Institut für Technische Physik, Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe, D-76021 Karlsruhe

Keywords: Undulator, Superconductive, In-Vacuum

 

Abstract

During the last years several attempts were undertaken to decrease the period length of undulators to the mm range. In this paper, a novel type of an in-vacuum undulator is described which is built with superconductive wires. The period length of this special device is 3.8 mm. In principle, it is possible to decrease this period length even further. A 100 period long undulator has been built and will be tested with beam in the near future.

 

Introduction

Following various publications on concepts of micro-undulators (Granatstein et al., 1985 and Tatchyn et al., 1987), work on a superconductive micro-undulator started in Karlsruhe in the early 90’s (Moser et al., 1991 and Holzapfel, 1991).

Independently a short prototype of a superconductive undulator with an 8.8 mm period was built at Brookhaven (Ben-Zvi et al. 1990) following a slightly different concept. Field calculations and measurements were performed recently with a longer prototype (G. Ingold et al. 1996). Also independently a group at Spectra Technology Inc. (S. C. Gottschalk et al. 1991) pointed out that FEL’s built with superconductive electro-magnetic undulators might have advantages over a design with permanent magnets. Since that time the interest in reducing the period length of undulators has grown steadily (Stefan et al., 1991, van Vaerenbergh, 1996, and Tanabe et al., 1997). In 1996, the Forschungszentrum started experimental work on a superconductive undulator with a period length of 3.8 mm. First results were presented 1997 by Hezel et al.

There are many reasons for building such undulators. They include

  • producing higher energy photons with a given particle beam energy and

  • obtaining a given spectrum with lower energy machines with favourable consequences for the brilliance.

Millimeter period undulators might also play an important role in the development of X-ray lasers in the future.

In principle, millimeter period length undulators can be built in various ways: they can be Halbach-type undulators (with permanent magnets), hybrid-type undulators or so-called electromagnetic undulators. Electromagnetic undulators generate the field by the current in a wire (Biot-Savart). Halbach-type undulators and hybrid undulators are difficult to build when the period length is in the mm-region: mechanical problems make the design difficult (Tatchyn et al., 1987 and Rakowsky et al., 1997). Electromagnetic undulators, on the other hand, have the disadvantage that both the required currents as well as the ohmic losses are relatively high. The use of superconductors instead of normal conductors reduces the ohmic losses to a negligible degree. For this reason ANKA is pursuing their development. The principal layout of the undulator is shown in fig. 1.

 

 

Fig. 1: Layout of the superconductive undulator.

 

Undulators with short periods require a small gap. According to the well known formula of the field strength in the gap as a function of the gap height

(B0 is the field at the pole, g is the gap height and l u is the undulator period) the period length should not be less than 4 times g in order to prevent reduction of the maximum field by more than ca. 20%. This poses a problem since the gap has to be in the mm range, therefore, the undulator must be integrated into the vacuum system. Otherwise the thickness of the vacuum chamber will already significantly reduce the strength of the maximum obtainable field. The different superconductive materials are selected according to their suitability for integration into a vacuum system: For example, NbTi conductors are integrated into a copper matrix. The metallic copper surface is almost ideal for installment in an UHV environment. Nb3Sn technology appears less appropriate and at the moment high Tc wires cannot handle the required current. Nevertheless, we feel that high Tc superconductors may play an important role in the future, especially if period lengths are further reduced.

In the following the technical layout, magnetic field calculations, and experimental results are presented.

Accelerator physics issues like the relationship between the gap height and the life-time, the influence of the impedance on instabilities as well as the question of magnetic field measurements within a small cryogenic gap would exceed the scope of this paper and are not considered here. Various investigations have shown that these problems can be solved, in particular for third generation synchrotron radiation sources (Stefan et al., 1997, Tatchyn, 1989 and Bane et al., 1993).

 

Technical layout of the undulator

For the undulator prototype a commercially available NbTi superconductor with a cross-section of 1.25 x 0.80 mm² (including insulation) has been chosen (Vakuumschmelze Hanau, 1996). Since superconductors are usually used in a high magnetic field environment, the quench behaviour in the low field region (where the undulator operates) is not well documented. Therefore, the quench current was measured as a function of an external field (fig. 2).

 

 

Fig. 2: Measurement of the quench current as a function of an external magnetic field.

 

From these experimental results we calculate the maximum field which can be obtained in the gap. Fig. 3 shows an optimized geometry and gives the maximum current through the wire limited by the magnetic field, the period length and the vertical field in the gap: the shaded areas represent non-magnetic material.

 

Geometry

period

length

[mm]

electr.

current

[A]

gap

 

[mm]

field in the gap

[T]

    

3.8

   

1470

 0.5

 

 1.0

  0.82

 

0.56

 

Fig. 3: Parameters of the undulator coil. The geometry is shown for one period only. The shaded areas represent non-magnetic material. The calculations were performed with MAFIA (1996).

 

Only layers close to the beam contribute to the magnetic field in the gap. Therefore, the undulator winding is limited to 4 layers. More layers would not significantly increase the field.

The maximum current of 1470 A as calculated with MAFIA (1996) is in good agreement with the measured value of 1400 A.

When iron is used instead of a non-magnetic material, the maximum field in the iron is 3 T and the field in a 1 mm gap is 1 T (fig. 4).

 

 

Fig. 4: Vertical cut through the undulator and corresponding vertical magnetic field.

 

The undulator is built in the following way. The body is produced first (fig. 5). It consists of a copper core through which liquid helium flows. Attached to this copper cylinder are four aluminium and one iron half-cylinder with grooves. In the test undulator presently under consideration, a cylindrical geometry was chosen in order to make it easier and cheaper to construct.

In the next step, the superconductive wire is wound from the original drum to a second drum. This procedure is stopped when half of the required wire is on the second drum. The middle of the wire is the starting point in the coiling procedure and is fixed in a groove on one of the aluminium half cylinders. The groove has the shape of a half-circle. From this point on the wires are wound in a bifilar way shown in fig. 6.

 

 

Fig. 5: Cross-section of the assembled undulator. A copper core cooled by liquid helium is located in the center. The iron half-cylinder is placed next to the electron beam and the aluminium half-cylinders are placed opposite to the beam.

 

 

Fig. 6: Photograph of the undulator prototype during coiling. The picture shows the bifilar coiling technique and the aluminium half cylinders.

 

The completely coiled 100 period long half-undulator is shown in fig. 7. The active length of the undulator is 38 cm. The copper blocks at the left end are used for the quench test and will be removed before the undulator is installed in a transportable cryostat (fig. 8).

The undulator shown in fig. 7 was tested in a vertical cryostat. The maximum current through the undulator was, as already mentioned, 1400 A.

 

 

Fig. 7: One completely coiled undulator plate ready for quench test in a vertical cryostat.

 

The cryostat for the beam test

A dewar which provides helium for the undulator and at the same time serves as a radiation shield is placed inside the vacuum chamber. The current flows to the undulator via copper wires. These wires are cooled first by gaseous helium and later by liquid helium in order to minimize the heat transfer from outside and to minimize the ohmic losses. When the undulator is not in use, the beam can bypass the undulator in the opening right of the undulator body. The gap height can be adjusted by bolts (at the moment only manually).

 

 

Fig. 8: The transportable cryostat.

 

The magnetic field and the particle trajectories

The following field calculations were performed with the help of MAFIA (1996). Fig. 9 shows the field in the middle of the 1 mm gap when the superconductor is imbedded in a non-magnetic material (fig. 9a) and in a magnetic material (fig. 9b).

Fig. 9a: The field of a 100 period undulator with a non-magnetic casing. The maximum field strength is about 0.4 T in a 1mm gap with 1000 A.

 

 

Fig. 9b: The field of a 100 period undulator with iron. The maximum field strength is close to 1 T in a 1mm gap with 1000 A.

 

The vertical field component of an undulator with a non-magnetic material is shown in figs. 10 and 11. This field has a strong sextupole component of about 4.96x105 T/m2.

 

Fig. 10: Field in the gap versus distance to the pole surface (undulator with non-magnetic casing). The minimum is in the center of the gap. The field increases towards the coils. The sextupole component is 4.96x105 T/m2.

 

Fig. 11 shows the 2-dimensional field plot for one period. The field in the center is sinusoidal, the sextupole field changes sign together with the field.

 

 

Fig. 11: Plot of the field in the undulator gap for one period along the trajectory. The undulator material is non-magnetic. y is the coordinate across the gap.

 

Theoretical studies on the influence of field errors and the end fields on the particle trajectory (J. A. Rossmanith, 1997) show that the displacement of the trajectory can be minimized with a matching section at the begin and the end of the undulator. This matching section is visible on the left-hand side of fig. 6. In the matching section the depth of the grooves is different compared to the rest of the undulator.

 

Conclusion

In the near future, the undulator is planned to be installed and tested in one of the beamlines of the 850 MeV microtron MAMI in Mainz. Depending on the success of these tests a modified superconductive undulator suitable for the use in storage rings will be designed and built later.

 

References

Bane, K. & Krinsky, S. (1993), Impedance of the NSLS Prototype Small-Gap Undulator Vacuum Chamber, BNL-48792, March 1993.

Ben-Zvi, I., Jiang, Z. Y., Ingold, G., Yu, L. H. & Sampson, W. B. (1990), The performance of a superconducting micro-undulator prototype, NIM A297 (1990) 301-305.

Gottschalk, S. C., Pindroh, A. L., Quimby, D. C., Robinson, K. E. & Slater, J. M. (1991), Enhanced FEL performance from superconductive undulators, NIM A304 (1991) 732-737.

Granatstein, V. L., Destler, W. W. & Mayergoyz, I. D. (1985), Small-period electromagnet wiggler for free-electron lasers, Appl. Phys. Lett. 47(6), 643-645.

Hezel, T., Rossmanith, R., Krevet, B. & Moser, H. O. (1997), Conceptual and Experimental Feasibility Study of a Superconductive Micro-Undulator, PAC’97, Vancouver, Canada.

Holzapfel, H. (1991), Diploma thesis, Entwurf eines supraleitenden Mikroundulators zur Erzeugung harter Synchrotronstrahlung, Universität Karlsruhe, Germany.

Ingold, G., Ben-Zvi, I., Solomon, L. & Woodle, M. (1996), Fabrication of a high-field short-period superconductive undulator, NIM A375 (1996) 451-455.

MAFIA (1996), CST Gesellschaft für Simulationstechnik mbH, Darmstadt, Germany

Moser, H. O., Krevet, B. & Holzapfel, H. (1991), Mikroundulator, Patentschrift DE 4101094 C1, Kernforschungszentrum Karlsruhe GmbH, Germany.

Rakowsky G., Aspenleiter, J. J., Graves, W. S., Solomon, L. & Stefan, P. M. (1997), Magnetic measurements on an in-vacuum undulator for the NSLS X-ray ring, PAC’97, Vancouver, Canada.

Rossmanith, J. A. (1997), 2-D Numerical Field and Trajectory Calculations of the ANKA Superconductive Micro-Undulator, ANKA Technical Note BES-06/97, unpublished.

Stefan, P. M., Solomon, L., Krinsky, S. & Rakowsky, G. (1991), NSLS Prototype Small-Gap Undulator (PSGU), Proc. IEEE Part. Accel. Conf., San Francisco, USA, 1096-1098.

Tanabe, T., Kitamura, H. & Stefan, P. M. (1997), Development of an In-vacuum Minipole Undulator, PAC’97, Vancouver, Canada.

Tatchyn, R. & Csonka, P. (1987), Attainment of submillimeter periods and a 0.3-T peak field in a novel micropole undulator device, Appl. Phys. Lett. 50 (7), 377-379.

Tatchyn, R. (1989), A dynamic method for continuously measuring magnetic field profiles in planar micropole undulators with submillimeter gaps, NIM A279 (1989) 655-664.

Vaerenbergh, P. van (1996), General Presentation of the ESRF Insertion Devices, 10th ICFA Beam Dynamics Panel, Workshop, WG7-1 - WG7-2, ESRF, France.

Vakuumschmelze Hanau (1996), Private communication, Hanau, Germany.