Quantum Physics
[Submitted on 20 Dec 2005 (v1), last revised 14 Feb 2006 (this version, v2)]
Title:Deterministic and Unambiguous Dense Coding
View PDFAbstract: Optimal dense coding using a partially-entangled pure state of Schmidt rank $\bar D$ and a noiseless quantum channel of dimension $D$ is studied both in the deterministic case where at most $L_d$ messages can be transmitted with perfect fidelity, and in the unambiguous case where when the protocol succeeds (probability $\tau_x$) Bob knows for sure that Alice sent message $x$, and when it fails (probability $1-\tau_x$) he knows it has failed. Alice is allowed any single-shot (one use) encoding procedure, and Bob any single-shot measurement. For $\bar D\leq D$ a bound is obtained for $L_d$ in terms of the largest Schmidt coefficient of the entangled state, and is compared with published results by Mozes et al. For $\bar D > D$ it is shown that $L_d$ is strictly less than $D^2$ unless $\bar D$ is an integer multiple of $D$, in which case uniform (maximal) entanglement is not needed to achieve the optimal protocol. The unambiguous case is studied for $\bar D \leq D$, assuming $\tau_x>0$ for a set of $\bar D D$ messages, and a bound is obtained for the average $\lgl1/\tau\rgl$. A bound on the average $\lgl\tau\rgl$ requires an additional assumption of encoding by isometries (unitaries when $\bar D=D$) that are orthogonal for different messages. Both bounds are saturated when $\tau_x$ is a constant independent of $x$, by a protocol based on one-shot entanglement concentration. For $\bar D > D$ it is shown that (at least) $D^2$ messages can be sent unambiguously. Whether unitary (isometric) encoding suffices for optimal protocols remains a major unanswered question, both for our work and for previous studies of dense coding using partially-entangled states, including noisy (mixed) states.
Submission history
From: Robert B. Griffiths [view email][v1] Tue, 20 Dec 2005 18:23:49 UTC (24 KB)
[v2] Tue, 14 Feb 2006 21:03:06 UTC (25 KB)
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.