Quantum Physics
[Submitted on 29 Nov 2003 (v1), revised 3 Dec 2003 (this version, v2), latest version 15 Jul 2004 (v3)]
Title:An Algorithmic Argument for Query Complexity Lower Bounds of Advised Quantum Computation
View PDFAbstract: This paper proves lower bounds of the quantum query complexity of a multiple-block ordered search problem, which is a natural generalization of the ordered search problems. Apart from much studied polynomial and adversary methods for quantum query complexity lower bounds, our proof employs an argument that (i) commences with the faulty assumption that a quantum algorithm of low query complexity exists, (ii) select any incompressible input, and (iii) constructs another algorithm that compresses the input, which leads to a this http URL this ``algorithmic'' argument, we show that the multi-block ordered search needs a large number of nonadaptive oracle queries on a black-box model of quantum computation supplemented by advice. This main theorem can be applied directly to two important notions in structural complexity theory: nonadaptive (truth-table) reducibility and autoreducibility. In particular, we prove: 1) there is an oracle A relative to which there is a set in P^A which is not quantumly nonadaptively reducible to A in polynomial time even with polynomial advice; 2) there is a polynomial-time adaptively probabilistically-autoreducible set which is not polynomial-time nonadaptively quantum-autoreducible even with any help of polynomial advice, and; 3) there is a set in ESPACE which is not polynomial-time nonadaptively quantum-autoreducible in polynomial time even in the presence of polynomial advice. For the single-block ordered search problem, our algorithmic argument also shows a large lower bound of the quantum query complexity in the presence of advice.
Submission history
From: Harumichi Nishimura [view email][v1] Sat, 29 Nov 2003 07:40:22 UTC (60 KB)
[v2] Wed, 3 Dec 2003 06:02:02 UTC (23 KB)
[v3] Thu, 15 Jul 2004 06:21:32 UTC (30 KB)
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.