Skip to main content
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

Physics > Physics and Society

arXiv:physics/0611089 (physics)
[Submitted on 9 Nov 2006 (v1), last revised 27 Mar 2007 (this version, v3)]

Title:Should there be more women in science and engineering?

Authors:Mathieu Bouville
View PDF
Abstract: Many people hold this truth to be self-evident, that there should be more female students in science and engineering. Typical arguments include possible benefits to women, possible benefits to the economy, and the unfairness of the current female under-representation. However, these justifications are never explicitly and thoroughly presented. Clearly stating and scrutinizing them, we show that they in fact have logical flaws. When made consistent, these arguments do not unconditionally justify enrolling more women in scientific disciplines. In particular, what women want must be taken into account. Outreach programs towards K-12 girls must therefore purport to allow them to choose a field freely, rather than try to draw as many of them to scientific disciplines as possible. This change of mindset must be accompanied by a close examination of the purpose and effects of these programs.
Keywords: female students, higher education, university, ethics, policy, outreach programs, minority students
Comments: 9 pages; long version of "Should we enrol more female students in physics?" published in the April 2007 issue of Physics World
Subjects: Physics and Society (physics.soc-ph); Physics Education (physics.ed-ph)
Cite as: arXiv:physics/0611089 [physics.soc-ph]
  (or arXiv:physics/0611089v3 [physics.soc-ph] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.physics/0611089
Journal reference: Science and Engineering Ethics, vol. 14, p. 279 (2008)
Related DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-007-9038-1

Submission history

From: Mathieu Bouville [view email]
[v1] Thu, 9 Nov 2006 19:48:47 UTC (15 KB)
[v2] Sun, 17 Dec 2006 15:43:28 UTC (19 KB)
[v3] Tue, 27 Mar 2007 09:04:19 UTC (16 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

view license
Current browse context:
physics.soc-ph
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2006-11

References & Citations

export BibTeX citation

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)