Physics > General Physics
[Submitted on 17 Jul 2000 (v1), revised 2 Dec 2000 (this version, v4), latest version 7 Nov 2011 (v8)]
Title:The Explanation of the New Astronomical Distance Data That has Resulted From Measurements of Type Ia Supernovae Lies Not In a Cosmological Constant and Accelerating Expansion; Rather, It Is Another Aspect / Effect of the General Exponential Decay of the Overall Universe
View PDFAbstract: Recently it has become possible to determine the distance to Type Ia supernovae by redshift-independent means. Those new distance determinations exceed the Hubble distance by 10 - 15%. The explanation others propose is that an "antigravity effect" is accelerating the universe' expansion, which had hitherto been thought to be slowing down because of gravitation. That has led to their proposing reinstatement of Einstein's "cosmological constant", a term in his equations introduced to account for gravitation not promptly collapsing the universe and which he disavowed upon Hubble's discovery of the expansion of the universe. And that has further led to their proposing some form of the Ancients' fifth essence, quintessence [the first four being earth, air, fire and water], to account for the "antigravity effect".
Any "antigravity effect", regardless of its cause, would have the effect of counteracting ordinary gravitation. Inasmuch as one of the major current problems in cosmology is to identify more gravitation to account for the cosmos's large scale structure and galaxies' centrifugal force, any "antigravity effect" to act as the cause of accelerating expansion would not appear to fit with the rest of the cosmological situation.
An alternative explanation is presented -- the general exponential decay of the overall universe, which has been analyzed and developed in several papers. The universal decay accounts for the greater distances and the necessary cosmic energy without the challenge to theory and to reasonableness that acceleration, its unknown cause, and a cosmological constant involve.
Submission history
From: Roger Ellman [view email][v1] Mon, 17 Jul 2000 21:14:33 UTC (93 KB)
[v2] Wed, 9 Aug 2000 03:57:53 UTC (93 KB)
[v3] Mon, 21 Aug 2000 03:17:58 UTC (113 KB)
[v4] Sat, 2 Dec 2000 21:14:26 UTC (114 KB)
[v5] Thu, 20 Oct 2005 00:50:57 UTC (122 KB)
[v6] Sat, 12 Nov 2005 18:10:54 UTC (124 KB)
[v7] Fri, 12 Oct 2007 18:50:45 UTC (209 KB)
[v8] Mon, 7 Nov 2011 21:53:09 UTC (141 KB)
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.