Skip to main content
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

High Energy Physics - Phenomenology

arXiv:hep-ph/0107170 (hep-ph)
[Submitted on 16 Jul 2001]

Title:Inconsistencies in Models for RHIC and LHC

Authors:K. Werner, H.J. Drescher, S.Ostapchenko, T.Pierog
View PDF
Abstract: The interpretation of experimental results at RHIC and in the future also at LHC requires very reliable and realistic models.
Considerable effort has been devoted to the development of such models during the past decade, many of them being heavily used in order to analyze data.
It is the purpose of this paper to point out serious inconsistencies in the above-mentioned approaches.
We will demonstrate that requiring theoretical self-consistency reduces the freedom in modeling high energy nuclear scattering enormously.
We will introduce a fully self-consistent formulation of the multiple-scattering scheme in the framework of a Gribov-Regge type effective theory.
In addition, we develop new computational techniques which allow for the first time a satisfactory solution of the problem in the sense that calculations of observable quantities can be done strictly within a self-consistent formalism.
Comments: Talk given at the 17th Winter Workshop on Nuclear Dynamics, March 2001, Park City, USA
Subjects: High Energy Physics - Phenomenology (hep-ph); Nuclear Theory (nucl-th)
Report number: SUBATECH 01-08
Cite as: arXiv:hep-ph/0107170
  (or arXiv:hep-ph/0107170v1 for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.hep-ph/0107170
Journal reference: Heavy Ion Phys. 15 (2002) 215-223
Related DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/APH.15.2002.3-4.5

Submission history

From: Klaus Werner [view email]
[v1] Mon, 16 Jul 2001 09:30:53 UTC (29 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

view license
Current browse context:
hep-ph
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2001-07

References & Citations

export BibTeX citation

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)