Skip to main content
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

Computer Science > Logic in Computer Science

arXiv:cs/0411094 (cs)
[Submitted on 25 Nov 2004 (v1), last revised 23 Feb 2005 (this version, v2)]

Title:On the existence of truly autonomic computing systems and the link with quantum computing

Authors:Radhakrishnan Srinivasan, H. P. Raghunandan
View PDF
Abstract: A theoretical model of truly autonomic computing systems (ACS), with infinitely many constraints, is proposed. An argument similar to Turing's for the unsolvability of the halting problem, which is permitted in classical logic, shows that such systems cannot exist. Turing's argument fails in the recently proposed non-Aristotelian finitary logic (NAFL), which permits the existence of ACS. NAFL also justifies quantum superposition and entanglement, which are essential ingredients of quantum algorithms, and resolves the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen (EPR) paradox in favour of quantum mechanics and non-locality. NAFL requires that the autonomic manager (AM) must be conceptually and architecturally distinct from the managed element, in order for the ACS to exist as a non-self-referential entity. Such a scenario is possible if the AM uses quantum algorithms and is protected from all problems by (unbreakable) quantum encryption, while the managed element remains classical. NAFL supports such a link between autonomic and quantum computing, with the AM existing as a metamathematical entity. NAFL also allows quantum algorithms to access truly random elements and thereby supports non-standard models of quantum (hyper-) computation that permit infinite parallelism.
Comments: 13 pages (two-column, single-spaced), 2 figures. Section 4 and Appendix B (with a figure in each) added. Improved explanations given for the NAFL model of (hyper-) computation (Sec. 6) and for the failure of relativistic locality in NAFL (Appendix B)
Subjects: Logic in Computer Science (cs.LO); Logic (math.LO); Quantum Physics (quant-ph)
ACM classes: F.4.1; F.1.1
Cite as: arXiv:cs/0411094 [cs.LO]
  (or arXiv:cs/0411094v2 [cs.LO] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.cs/0411094

Submission history

From: Radhakrishnan Srinivasan [view email]
[v1] Thu, 25 Nov 2004 13:16:55 UTC (144 KB)
[v2] Wed, 23 Feb 2005 11:41:44 UTC (162 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

  • View PDF
  • Other Formats
view license
Current browse context:
cs.LO
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2004-11

References & Citations

DBLP - CS Bibliography

listing | bibtex
Radhakrishnan Srinivasan
H. P. Raghunandan
export BibTeX citation

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)