Astrophysics
[Submitted on 6 Jun 1997 (v1), last revised 16 Jun 1997 (this version, v2)]
Title:Large-scale bias in the Universe: bispectrum method
View PDFAbstract: Evidence that the Universe may be close to the critical density, required for its expansion eventually to be halted, comes principally from dynamical studies of large-scale structure. These studies either use the observed peculiar velocity field of galaxies directly, or indirectly by quantifying its anisotropic effect on galaxy clustering in redshift surveys. A potential difficulty with both such approaches is that the density parameter $\Omega_0$ is obtained only in the combination $\beta = \Omega_0^{0.6}/b$, if linear perturbation theory is used. The determination of the density parameter $\Omega_0$ is therefore compromised by the lack of a good measurement of the bias parameter $b$, which relates the clustering of sample galaxies to the clustering of mass.
In this paper, we develop an idea of Fry (1994), using second-order perturbation theory to investigate how to measure the bias parameter on large scales. The use of higher-order statistics allows the degeneracy between $b$ and $\Omega_0$ to be lifted, and an unambiguous determination of $\Omega_0$ then becomes possible. We apply a likelihood approach to the bispectrum, the three-point function in Fourier space. This paper is the first step in turning the idea into a practical proposition for redshift surveys, and is principally concerned with noise properties of the bispectrum, which are non-trivial. The calculation of the required bispectrum covariances involves the six-point function, including many noise terms, for which we have developed a generating functional approach which will be of value in calculating high-order statistics in general.
Submission history
From: Alan Heavens [view email][v1] Fri, 6 Jun 1997 08:18:25 UTC (39 KB)
[v2] Mon, 16 Jun 1997 11:14:12 UTC (39 KB)
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv Recommender
(What is IArxiv?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.