Astrophysics
[Submitted on 16 May 1997]
Title:Testing Cosmological Models Against the Abundance of Damped Lyman-Alpha Absorbers
View PDFAbstract: We calculate the number of damped Lyman-alpha absorbers expected in various popular cosmological models as a function of redshift and compare our predictions with observed abundances. The Press-Schechter formalism is used to obtain the distribution of halos with circular velocity in different cosmologies, and we calibrate the relation between circular velocity and absorption cross-section using detailed gas dynamical simulations of a ``standard'' cold dark matter (CDM) model. Because of this calibration, our approach makes more realistic assumptions about the absorption properties of collapsed objects than previous, analytic calculations of the damped Lyman-alpha abundance. CDM models with Omega_0=1, H_0=50, baryon density Omega_b=0.05, and scale-invariant primeval fluctuations reproduce the observed incidence and redshift evolution of damped Lyman-alpha absorption to within observational uncertainty, for both COBE normalization (sigma_8=1.2) and a lower normalization (sigma_8=0.7) that better matches the observed cluster abundance at z=0. A tilted (n=0.8, sigma_8=0.7) CDM model tends to underproduce absorption, especially at z=4. With COBE normalization, a CDM model with Omega_0=0.4, Omega_{Lambda}=0.6 gives an acceptable fit to the observed absorption; an open CDM model is marginally acceptable if Omega_0 is at least 0.4 and strongly inconsistent with the z=4 data if Omega_0=0.3. Mixed dark matter models tend not to produce sufficient absorption, being roughly comparable to tilted CDM models if Omega_{nu} = 0.2 and failing drastically if Omega_{nu} = 0.3.
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv Recommender
(What is IArxiv?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.