Astrophysics
[Submitted on 24 Apr 1997 (v1), last revised 25 Aug 1997 (this version, v2)]
Title:Testing deprojection algorithms on mock angular catalogues: Evidence for a break in the power spectrum
View PDFAbstract: We produce mock angular catalogues from simulations with different initial power spectra to test methods that recover measures of clustering in three dimensions, such as the power spectrum, variance and higher order cumulants. We find that the statistical properties derived from the angular mock catalogues are in good agreement with the intrinsic clustering in the simulations. In particular, we concentrate on the detailed predictions for the shape of the power spectrum, $P(k)$. We find that there is good evidence for a break in the galaxy $P(k)$ at scales between $ 0.02 < k < 0.06 ~\impc$ using an inversion technique applied to the angular correlation function measured from the APM Galaxy Survey. For variants on the standard Cold Dark Matter model, a fit at the location of the break implies $\Omega h= 0.45 \pm 0.10$, where $\Omega$ is the ratio of the total matter density to the critical density and Hubble's constant is parameterised as $H_{0}= 100~hkm ~s^{-1}Mpc^{-1}$. On slightly smaller, though still quasi-linear scales, there is a feature in the APM power spectrum where the local slope changes appreciably, with the best match to CDM models obtained for $\Omega h \simeq 0.2$. Hence the location and narrowness of the break in the APM power spectrum combined with the rapid change in its slope on quasi-linear scales cannot be matched by any variant of CDM, including models that have a non-zero cosmological constant or a tilt to the slope of the primordial $P(k)$. These results are independent of the overall normalization of the CDM models or any simple bias that exists between the galaxy and mass distributions.
Submission history
From: Enrique Gaztanaga [view email][v1] Thu, 24 Apr 1997 19:41:33 UTC (269 KB)
[v2] Mon, 25 Aug 1997 12:25:08 UTC (284 KB)
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv Recommender
(What is IArxiv?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.