Skip to main content
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

Computer Science > Software Engineering

arXiv:2504.04921 (cs)
[Submitted on 7 Apr 2025]

Title:Expectations vs Reality -- A Secondary Study on AI Adoption in Software Testing

Authors:Katja Karhu, Jussi Kasurinen, Kari Smolander
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:In the software industry, artificial intelligence (AI) has been utilized more and more in software development activities. In some activities, such as coding, AI has already been an everyday tool, but in software testing activities AI it has not yet made a significant breakthrough. In this paper, the objective was to identify what kind of empirical research with industry context has been conducted on AI in software testing, as well as how AI has been adopted in software testing practice. To achieve this, we performed a systematic mapping study of recent (2020 and later) studies on AI adoption in software testing in the industry, and applied thematic analysis to identify common themes and categories, such as the real-world use cases and benefits, in the found papers. The observations suggest that AI is not yet heavily utilized in software testing, and still relatively few studies on AI adoption in software testing have been conducted in the industry context to solve real-world problems. Earlier studies indicated there was a noticeable gap between the actual use cases and actual benefits versus the expectations, which we analyzed further. While there were numerous potential use cases for AI in software testing, such as test case generation, code analysis, and intelligent test automation, the reported actual implementations and observed benefits were limited. In addition, the systematic mapping study revealed a potential problem with false positive search results in online databases when using the search string "artificial intelligence".
Comments: 26 pages, 1 figure, submitted to Software Testing, Vertification and Reliability journal
Subjects: Software Engineering (cs.SE); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
Cite as: arXiv:2504.04921 [cs.SE]
  (or arXiv:2504.04921v1 [cs.SE] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2504.04921

Submission history

From: Katja Karhu [view email]
[v1] Mon, 7 Apr 2025 11:03:54 UTC (182 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

license icon view license
Current browse context:
cs.SE
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2025-04
Change to browse by:
cs
cs.AI

References & Citations

export BibTeX citation

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)