Skip to main content
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

Computer Science > Software Engineering

arXiv:2503.15277 (cs)
[Submitted on 19 Mar 2025]

Title:What Makes a Good TODO Comment?

Authors:Haoye Wang, Zhipeng Gao, Tingting Bi, John Grundy, Xinyu Wang, Minghui Wu, Xiaohu Yang
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Software development is a collaborative process that involves various interactions among individuals and teams. TODO comments in source code play a critical role in managing and coordinating diverse tasks during this process. However, this study finds that a large proportion of open-source project TODO comments are left unresolved or take a long time to be resolved. About 46.7\% of TODO comments in open-source repositories are of low-quality (e.g., TODOs that are ambiguous, lack information, or are useless to developers). This highlights the need for better TODO practices. In this study, we investigate four aspects regarding the quality of TODO comments in open-source projects: (1) the prevalence of low-quality TODO comments; (2) the key characteristics of high-quality TODO comments; (3) how are TODO comments of different quality managed in practice; and (4) the feasibility of automatically assessing TODO comment quality. Examining 2,863 TODO comments from Top100 GitHub Java repositories, we propose criteria to identify high-quality TODO comments and provide insights into their optimal composition. We discuss the lifecycle of TODO comments with varying quality. we construct deep learning-based methods that show promising performance in identifying the quality of TODO comments, potentially enhancing development efficiency and code quality.
Subjects: Software Engineering (cs.SE)
Cite as: arXiv:2503.15277 [cs.SE]
  (or arXiv:2503.15277v1 [cs.SE] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2503.15277
Related DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3664811

Submission history

From: Zhipeng Gao [view email]
[v1] Wed, 19 Mar 2025 14:55:01 UTC (748 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

view license
Current browse context:
cs.SE
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2025-03
Change to browse by:
cs

References & Citations

export BibTeX citation

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)