Skip to main content
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

Computer Science > Logic in Computer Science

arXiv:2502.08307 (cs)
[Submitted on 12 Feb 2025 (v1), last revised 13 Feb 2025 (this version, v2)]

Title:Stronger Validity Criteria for Encoding Synchrony

Authors:Rob van Glabbeek, Ursula Goltz, Christopher Lippert, Stephan Mennicke
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:We analyse two translations from the synchronous into the asynchronous $\pi$-calculus, both without choice, that are often quoted as standard examples of valid encodings, showing that the asynchronous $\pi$-calculus is just as expressive as the synchronous one. We examine which of the quality criteria for encodings from the literature support the validity of these translations. Moreover, we prove their validity according to much stronger criteria than considered previously in the literature.
Comments: Written in 2019. Dedicated to Catuscia Palamidessi, on the occasion of her 60th birthday
Subjects: Logic in Computer Science (cs.LO)
ACM classes: F.3.2
Cite as: arXiv:2502.08307 [cs.LO]
  (or arXiv:2502.08307v2 [cs.LO] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2502.08307
Journal reference: In The Art of Modelling Computational Systems: A Journey from Logic and Concurrency to Security and Privacy - Essays Dedicated to Catuscia Palamidessi on the Occasion of Her 60th Birthday, LNCS 11760, Springer, 2019, pp. 182-205
Related DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31175-9_11

Submission history

From: Rob van Glabbeek [view email]
[v1] Wed, 12 Feb 2025 11:21:48 UTC (23 KB)
[v2] Thu, 13 Feb 2025 18:28:04 UTC (38 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

view license
Current browse context:
cs.LO
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2025-02
Change to browse by:
cs

References & Citations

export BibTeX citation

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)