Skip to main content
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence

arXiv:2412.17632 (cs)
[Submitted on 23 Dec 2024]

Title:ANID: How Far Are We? Evaluating the Discrepancies Between AI-synthesized Images and Natural Images through Multimodal Guidance

Authors:Renyang Liu, Ziyu Lyu, Wei Zhou, See-Kiong Ng
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:In the rapidly evolving field of Artificial Intelligence Generated Content (AIGC), one of the key challenges is distinguishing AI-synthesized images from natural images. Despite the remarkable capabilities of advanced AI generative models in producing visually compelling images, significant discrepancies remain when these images are compared to natural ones. To systematically investigate and quantify these discrepancies, we introduce an AI-Natural Image Discrepancy Evaluation benchmark aimed at addressing the critical question: \textit{how far are AI-generated images (AIGIs) from truly realistic images?} We have constructed a large-scale multimodal dataset, the Distinguishing Natural and AI-generated Images (DNAI) dataset, which includes over 440,000 AIGI samples generated by 8 representative models using both unimodal and multimodal prompts, such as Text-to-Image (T2I), Image-to-Image (I2I), and Text \textit{vs.} Image-to-Image (TI2I). Our fine-grained assessment framework provides a comprehensive evaluation of the DNAI dataset across five key dimensions: naive visual feature quality, semantic alignment in multimodal generation, aesthetic appeal, downstream task applicability, and coordinated human validation. Extensive evaluation results highlight significant discrepancies across these dimensions, underscoring the necessity of aligning quantitative metrics with human judgment to achieve a holistic understanding of AI-generated image quality. Code is available at \href{this https URL}{this https URL}.
Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV); Multimedia (cs.MM)
Cite as: arXiv:2412.17632 [cs.AI]
  (or arXiv:2412.17632v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2412.17632

Submission history

From: Renyang Liu [view email]
[v1] Mon, 23 Dec 2024 15:08:08 UTC (6,171 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

view license
Current browse context:
cs.AI
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2024-12
Change to browse by:
cs
cs.CV
cs.MM

References & Citations

export BibTeX citation

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)