Skip to main content
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

Computer Science > Formal Languages and Automata Theory

arXiv:2408.09871 (cs)
[Submitted on 19 Aug 2024 (v1), last revised 22 Aug 2024 (this version, v2)]

Title:Exploring Complexity: An Extended Study of Formal Properties for Process Model Complexity Measures

Authors:Patrizia Schalk, Adam Burke, Robert Lorenz
View PDF
Abstract:A good process model is expected not only to reflect the behavior of the process, but also to be as easy to read and understand as possible. Because preferences vary across different applications, numerous measures provide ways to reflect the complexity of a model with a numeric score. However, this abundance of different complexity measures makes it difficult to select one for analysis. Furthermore, most complexity measures are defined for BPMN or EPC, but not for workflow nets.
This paper is an extended analysis of complexity measures and their formal properties. It adapts existing complexity measures to the world of workflow nets. It then compares these measures with a set of properties originally defined for software complexity, as well as new extensions to it. We discuss the importance of the properties in theory by evaluating whether matured complexity measures should fulfill them or whether they are optional. We find that not all inspected properties are mandatory, but also demonstrate that the behavior of evolutionary process discovery algorithms is influenced by some of these properties. Our findings help analysts to choose the right complexity measure for their use-case.
Comments: 73 pages, 68 figures
Subjects: Formal Languages and Automata Theory (cs.FL)
ACM classes: F.4.3; H.1.1
Cite as: arXiv:2408.09871 [cs.FL]
  (or arXiv:2408.09871v2 [cs.FL] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2408.09871

Submission history

From: Patrizia Schalk [view email]
[v1] Mon, 19 Aug 2024 10:23:43 UTC (159 KB)
[v2] Thu, 22 Aug 2024 14:24:03 UTC (73 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
license icon view license
Current browse context:
cs.FL
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2024-08
Change to browse by:
cs

References & Citations

export BibTeX citation

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)