Quantitative Biology > Populations and Evolution
[Submitted on 11 Dec 2023 (v1), revised 14 Dec 2023 (this version, v2), latest version 30 Jun 2024 (v5)]
Title:A picture guide to cancer progression and monotonic accumulation models: evolutionary assumptions, plausible interpretations, and alternative uses
View PDFAbstract:Cancer progression and monotonic accumulation models were developed to discover dependencies in the irreversible acquisition of binary traits from cross-sectional data. They have been used in computational oncology and virology to understand dependencies in the accumulation of mutations but also in widely different problems such as malaria progression.
These tools have been used to make predictions about future and unobserved states of the system, identify different routes of feature acquisition in subsets of the data, and improve patient stratification based on the evolutionary trajectories.
But these methods have shortcomings, in particular with respect to key evolutionary assumptions and interpretations. After an overview of the available methods, I focus on how and why the methods can fail and why their inferences might not be about the process we intend. I first examine interpretations and violations of assumptions when methods are used to infer within-cell restrictions in the accumulation of events. The discussion uses fitness landscapes and highlights the difficulties that arise from bulk sequencing and reciprocal sign epistasis, from the conflation of lines of descent, path of the maximum, and mutational profiles, and from the ambiguous use of the concepts of exclusivity and alternative evolutionary paths. Next, I suggest that users recognize the limitations that arise from their sampling designs, and I examine how the previous concerns are modified when bulk sequencing is accounted for. I also highlight how bulk sequencing can create an opportunity for addressing dependencies that arise from frequency-dependent selection. This review should help identify major standing issues and research opportunities, and encourage the use of these methods in other areas with a possibly better fit between entities and model assumptions.
Submission history
From: Ramon Diaz-Uriarte [view email][v1] Mon, 11 Dec 2023 20:24:11 UTC (1,362 KB)
[v2] Thu, 14 Dec 2023 11:15:30 UTC (1,370 KB)
[v3] Fri, 7 Jun 2024 14:59:13 UTC (1,438 KB)
[v4] Wed, 19 Jun 2024 01:21:46 UTC (1,427 KB)
[v5] Sun, 30 Jun 2024 19:26:09 UTC (1,430 KB)
Current browse context:
q-bio.PE
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.