Skip to main content
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

Physics > History and Philosophy of Physics

arXiv:2304.06860 (physics)
[Submitted on 13 Apr 2023 (v1), last revised 5 Sep 2024 (this version, v2)]

Title:A critique of one of Galileo's mental experiments and an explanation on why bodies fall with equal acceleration through the vacuum

Authors:Leonardo Levinas
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:In the famous thought experiment studied in this article, Galileo attempted to refute the Aristotelian hypothesis that heavier bodies should fall more quickly than lighter ones. After pointing out some inconsistencies in Galileo's approach, we show, through the design of two alternative but equivalent experiments, that from his imaginary experiment, it is not possible to reach the conclusion that all bodies fall simultaneously. We show why, to explain the result of this type of experience, it is necessary to establish the equivalence between inertial and gravitational masses derived exclusively from experience.
Comments: 10 pages, 2 figures
Subjects: History and Philosophy of Physics (physics.hist-ph)
Cite as: arXiv:2304.06860 [physics.hist-ph]
  (or arXiv:2304.06860v2 [physics.hist-ph] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2304.06860

Submission history

From: Leonardo Levinas Phd. [view email]
[v1] Thu, 13 Apr 2023 23:23:05 UTC (593 KB)
[v2] Thu, 5 Sep 2024 18:18:52 UTC (22 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

view license
Current browse context:
physics.hist-ph
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2023-04
Change to browse by:
physics

References & Citations

export BibTeX citation

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)