Skip to main content
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

Physics > Medical Physics

arXiv:2304.05834 (physics)
[Submitted on 12 Apr 2023]

Title:Comparative studies of the sensitivities of sparse and full geometries of Total-Body PET scanners built from crystals and plastic scintillators

Authors:Meysam Dadgar, Szymon Parzych, Jakub Baran, Neha Chug, Catalina Curceanu, Eryk Czerwiński, Kamil Dulski, Kavya Elyan, Aleksander Gajos, Beatrix Hiesmayr, Łukasz Kapłon, Konrad Klimaszewski, Paweł Konieczka, Grzegorz Korcyl, Tomasz Kozik, Wojciech Krzemień, Deepak Kumar, Szymon Niedźwiecki, Domonik Panek, Eleną Perez del Rio, Lech Raczyński, Sushil Sharma, Shivani, Roman Shopa, Magdalena Skurzok, Ewa Stępień, Faranak. Tayefi Ardebili, Keyvan. Tayefi Ardebili, Stefaan. Vandenberghe, Wojciech. Wiślicki, Paweł. Moskal
View PDF
Abstract:Background: Total-Body imaging offers high sensitivity, single-bed position, and low dose, but high construction costs limit worldwide utilization. This study compares existing and developing tomographs using plastic scintillators via simulations to propose a cost-efficient Total-Body PET scanner.
Methods: Simulations of eight uEXPLORER tomographs with different scintillator materials, axial field-of-view, and detector configuration, and eight J-PET scanners with various field-of-view, plastic scintillator cross-sections, and layers were performed. Biograph Vision was also simulated. Two types of simulations were conducted with a central source and a water-filled phantom.
Results: BGO crystal-based scanners showed the best sensitivity (350 cps/kBq at the center). Sparse geometry or LYSO crystals reduced sensitivity. J-PET design showed similar sensitivity to sparse LYSO detectors, with full body coverage and additional gain for brain imaging.
Conclusion: The J-PET tomography system using plastic scintillators could be a cost-efficient alternative for Total-Body PET scanners, overcoming high construction costs while maintaining sensitivity
Subjects: Medical Physics (physics.med-ph)
Cite as: arXiv:2304.05834 [physics.med-ph]
  (or arXiv:2304.05834v1 [physics.med-ph] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2304.05834

Submission history

From: Meysam Dadgar [view email]
[v1] Wed, 12 Apr 2023 13:08:20 UTC (3,204 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

  • View PDF
  • Other Formats
view license
Current browse context:
physics.med-ph
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2023-04
Change to browse by:
physics

References & Citations

export BibTeX citation

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)