Physics > Instrumentation and Detectors
[Submitted on 19 Jun 2022 (v1), last revised 27 Sep 2022 (this version, v2)]
Title:Theoretical comparison of real-time feedback-driven single-particle tracking techniques
View PDFAbstract:Real-time feedback-driven single-particle tracking is a technique that uses feedback control to enable single-molecule spectroscopy of freely diffusing particles in native or near-native environments. A number of different RT-FD-SPT approaches exist, and comparisons between methods based on experimental results are of limited use due to differences in samples and setups. In this study, we used statistical calculations and dynamical simulations to directly compare the performance of different methods. The methods considered were the orbital method, the Knight`s Tour (grid scan) method and MINFLUX, and we considered both fluorescence-based and interferometric scattering (iSCAT) approaches. There is a fundamental trade-off between precision and speed, with the Knight`s Tour method being able to track the fastest diffusion but with low precision, and MINFLUX being the most precise but only tracking slow diffusion. To compare iSCAT and fluorescence, different biological samples were considered, including labeled and intrinsically fluorescent samples. The success of iSCAT as compared to fluorescence is strongly dependent on the particle size and the density and photophysical properties of the fluorescent particles. Using a wavelength for iSCAT that is negligibly absorbed by the tracked particle allows an increased illumination intensity, which results in iSCAT providing better tracking for most samples. This work highlights the fundamental aspects of performance in RT-FD-SPT and should assist with the selection of an appropriate method for a particular application. The approach used can easily be extended to other RT-FD-SPT methods.
Submission history
From: Bertus van Heerden [view email][v1] Sun, 19 Jun 2022 14:54:36 UTC (5,343 KB)
[v2] Tue, 27 Sep 2022 17:29:39 UTC (5,344 KB)
Current browse context:
physics.ins-det
Change to browse by:
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.