Physics > Plasma Physics
[Submitted on 28 Jun 2022]
Title:Testing the conservative character of particle simulations: II. Spurious heating of guiding centers and full orbits subject to fluctuations expressed in terms of ${\bf E}$ and ${\bf B}$
View PDFAbstract:For an axisymmetric tokamak plasma, Hamiltonian theory predicts that the orbits of charged particles must stay on invariant tori of conserved energy in the moving frame of reference of a wave that propagates along the torus with a fixed angular phase velocity. In principle, this is true for arbitrary mode structures in the poloidal plane, but only if the fluctuations are expressed in terms of potentials $\Phi$ and ${\bf A}$, which satisfy Faraday's law by definition. Here, we use the physical fields ${\bf E}$ and ${\bf B}$, where Faraday's law may be violated by errors introduced during the process of computing or designing the wave field through numerical inaccuracies, approximations, or gross negligence. Numerical heating caused by noise-like artifacts on the grid scale can to some extent be reduced via shorter time steps. In contrast, coherent inconsistencies between ${\bf E}$ and ${\bf B}$ cause spurious acceleration that is independent of time steps or numerical methods, but can be sensitive to geometry. In particular, we show that secular acceleration is enhanced when one imposes nonnormal modes that possess strong up-down asymmetry instead of the usual in-out asymmetry of normal toroidal (eigen)modes. Our tests are performed for full gyroorbit and guiding center (GC) models, which give similar results. In addition, we show that $N$-point gyroaveraging is not a recommendable method to enhance the realism of GC simulations. Besides breaking conservation laws, $N$-point gyroaveraging in our example makes the GC results deviate further from the full orbit results, showing that this method can even give the wrong trend.
Submission history
From: Andreas Bierwage [view email][v1] Tue, 28 Jun 2022 09:23:48 UTC (4,841 KB)
Current browse context:
physics.plasm-ph
Change to browse by:
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.