High Energy Physics - Phenomenology
[Submitted on 10 Aug 2021 (v1), last revised 8 Jan 2022 (this version, v4)]
Title:Subleading contributions to the decay width of the $T_{cc}^+$ tetraquark
View PDFAbstract:Recently the LHCb collaboration has announced the discovery of the $T_{cc}^+$ tetraquark. Being merely a few hundred ${\rm keV}$ below the $D^{*+} D^0$ threshold, the $T_{cc}^+$ is expected to have a molecular component, for which there is a good separation of scales that can be exploited to make reasonably accurate theoretical predictions about this tetraquark. Independently of its nature, the most important decay channels will be $D^+ D^0 \pi^0$, $D^0 D^0 \pi^+$ and $D^+ D^0 \gamma$. Its closeness to threshold suggests that the mass and particularly the width of the $T_{cc}^+$ tetraquark depend on the resonance profile. While the standard Breit-Wigner parametrization generates a $T_{cc}^+$ that is too broad for current theoretical calculations to reproduce, a three-body unitarized Breit-Wigner shape reveals instead a decay width ($\Gamma_{\rm pole} = 48\pm 2\,{}^{+0}_{-12}\,{\rm keV}$) consistent with theoretical expectations. Here we consider subleading order contributions to the decay amplitude, which though having at most a moderate impact in the width still indicate potentially significant differences with the experimental width that can be exploited to disentangle the nature of the $T_{cc}^+$. Concrete calculations yield $\Gamma^{\rm LO} = 49 \pm 16\,{\rm keV}$ and $\Gamma^{\rm NLO} = 58^{+7}_{-6}\,{\rm keV}$, though we expect further corrections to the ${\rm NLO}$ decay widths from asymptotic normalization effects. We find that a detailed comparison of the ${\rm NLO}$ total and partial decay widths with experiment suggests the existence of a small (but distinguishable from zero) non-molecular component of the $T_{cc}^+$.
Submission history
From: Manuel Pavon Valderrama [view email][v1] Tue, 10 Aug 2021 16:56:09 UTC (106 KB)
[v2] Fri, 13 Aug 2021 17:09:47 UTC (109 KB)
[v3] Tue, 5 Oct 2021 12:18:17 UTC (118 KB)
[v4] Sat, 8 Jan 2022 14:59:26 UTC (119 KB)
Current browse context:
hep-ph
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv Recommender
(What is IArxiv?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.