Skip to main content
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

Physics > Medical Physics

arXiv:2102.02698 (physics)
[Submitted on 4 Feb 2021]

Title:On the Eptihermal Neutron Energy Limit for Accelerator-Based Boron Neutron Capture Therapy (AB-BNCT): Study and Impact of New Energy Limits

Authors:Marine Hervé, Nadine Sauzet, Daniel Santos
View PDF
Abstract:Background and purpose: Accelerator-Based Boron Neutron Capture Therapy is a radiotherapy based on compact accelerator neutron sources requiring an epithermal neutron field for tumour irradiations. Neutrons of 10 keV are considered as the maximum optimised energy to treat deep-seated tumours. We investigated, by means of Monte Carlo simulations, the epithermal range from 10 eV to 10 keV in order to optimise the maximum epithermal neutron energy as a function of the tumour depth.
Methods: A Snyder head phantom was simulated and mono-energetic neutrons with 4 different incident energies were used: 10 eV, 100 eV, 1 keV and 10 keV. $^{10}$B capture rates and absorbed dose composition on every tissue were calculated to describe and compare the effects of lowering the maximum epithermal energy. The Therapeutic Gain (TG) was estimated considering the whole brain volume.
Results: For tumours seated at 4 cm depth, 10 eV, 100 eV and 1 keV neutrons provided respectively 54 $\%$, 36 $\%$ and 18 $\%$ increase on the TG compared to 10 keV neutrons. Neutrons with energies between 10 eV and 1 keV provided higher TG than 10 keV neutrons for tumours seated up to 6.4 cm depth inside the head. The size of the tumour does not change these results.
Conclusions: Using lower epithermal energy neutrons for AB-BNCT tumour irradiation could improve treatment efficacy, delivering more therapeutic dose while reducing the dose in healthy tissues. This could lead to new Beam Shape Assembly designs in order to optimise the BNCT irradiation.
Subjects: Medical Physics (physics.med-ph)
Cite as: arXiv:2102.02698 [physics.med-ph]
  (or arXiv:2102.02698v1 [physics.med-ph] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2102.02698

Submission history

From: Marine Hervé [view email]
[v1] Thu, 4 Feb 2021 15:48:28 UTC (2,722 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
view license
Current browse context:
physics.med-ph
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2021-02
Change to browse by:
physics

References & Citations

export BibTeX citation

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)