Computer Science > Machine Learning
[Submitted on 17 Dec 2020 (v1), last revised 8 Nov 2021 (this version, v3)]
Title:Near-Optimal Statistical Query Hardness of Learning Halfspaces with Massart Noise
View PDFAbstract:We study the problem of PAC learning halfspaces with Massart noise. Given labeled samples $(x, y)$ from a distribution $D$ on $\mathbb{R}^{d} \times \{ \pm 1\}$ such that the marginal $D_x$ on the examples is arbitrary and the label $y$ of example $x$ is generated from the target halfspace corrupted by a Massart adversary with flipping probability $\eta(x) \leq \eta \leq 1/2$, the goal is to compute a hypothesis with small misclassification error. The best known $\mathrm{poly}(d, 1/\epsilon)$-time algorithms for this problem achieve error of $\eta+\epsilon$, which can be far from the optimal bound of $\mathrm{OPT}+\epsilon$, where $\mathrm{OPT} = \mathbf{E}_{x \sim D_x} [\eta(x)]$. While it is known that achieving $\mathrm{OPT}+o(1)$ error requires super-polynomial time in the Statistical Query model, a large gap remains between known upper and lower bounds.
In this work, we essentially characterize the efficient learnability of Massart halfspaces in the Statistical Query (SQ) model. Specifically, we show that no efficient SQ algorithm for learning Massart halfspaces on $\mathbb{R}^d$ can achieve error better than $\Omega(\eta)$, even if $\mathrm{OPT} = 2^{-\log^{c} (d)}$, for any universal constant $c \in (0, 1)$. Furthermore, when the noise upper bound $\eta$ is close to $1/2$, our error lower bound becomes $\eta - o_{\eta}(1)$, where the $o_{\eta}(1)$ term goes to $0$ when $\eta$ approaches $1/2$. Our results provide strong evidence that known learning algorithms for Massart halfspaces are nearly best possible, thereby resolving a longstanding open problem in learning theory.
Submission history
From: Ilias Diakonikolas [view email][v1] Thu, 17 Dec 2020 16:43:11 UTC (24 KB)
[v2] Mon, 23 Aug 2021 16:18:45 UTC (143 KB)
[v3] Mon, 8 Nov 2021 18:19:54 UTC (31 KB)
Current browse context:
cs.LG
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv Recommender
(What is IArxiv?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.