Skip to main content
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

Statistics > Applications

arXiv:2005.06617 (stat)
COVID-19 e-print

Important: e-prints posted on arXiv are not peer-reviewed by arXiv; they should not be relied upon without context to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information without consulting multiple experts in the field.

[Submitted on 6 May 2020 (v1), last revised 9 Mar 2022 (this version, v2)]

Title:Conservative two-stage group testing in the linear regime

Authors:Matthew Aldridge
View PDF
Abstract:Inspired by applications in testing for Covid-19, we consider a variant of two-stage group testing called "conservative" (or "trivial") two-stage testing, where every item declared to be defective must be definitively confirmed by being tested by itself in the second stage. We study this in the linear regime where the prevalence is fixed while the number of items is large. We study various nonadaptive test designs for the first stage, and derive a new lower bound for the total number of tests required. We find that a first-stage design as studied by Broder and Kumar (arXiv:2004.01684) with constant tests per item and constant items per test is extremely close to optimal for all prevalences, and is optimal in the limit as the prevalence tends to zero. Simulations back up the theoretical results.
Comments: 21 pages, 1 figure
Subjects: Applications (stat.AP); Information Theory (cs.IT)
Cite as: arXiv:2005.06617 [stat.AP]
  (or arXiv:2005.06617v2 [stat.AP] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2005.06617

Submission history

From: Matthew Aldridge [view email]
[v1] Wed, 6 May 2020 22:14:49 UTC (327 KB)
[v2] Wed, 9 Mar 2022 00:31:07 UTC (321 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

view license
Current browse context:
cs
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2020-05
Change to browse by:
cs.IT
math
math.IT
stat
stat.AP

References & Citations

export BibTeX citation

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)