Quantum Physics
[Submitted on 18 Feb 2020 (this version), latest version 24 Mar 2020 (v2)]
Title:What limits the simulation of quantum computers?
View PDFAbstract:It is well established that simulating a perfect quantum computer with a classical computer requires computing resources that scale exponentially with the number of qubits $N$ or the depth $D$ of the circuit. Conversely, a perfect quantum computer could potentially provide an exponential speed up with respect to classical hardware. Real quantum computers however are not perfect: they are characterized by a small error rate $\epsilon$ per operation, so that the fidelity of the many-qubit quantum state decays exponentially as $ {\cal{F}} \sim (1-\epsilon)^{ND}$. Here, we discuss a set of classical algorithms based on matrix product states (MPS) which closely mimic the behavior of actual quantum computers. These algorithms require resources that scale linearly in $N$ and $D$ at the cost of making a small error $\epsilon$ per two-qubit gate. We illustrate our algorithms with simulations of random circuits for qubits connected in both one and two dimensional lattices. We find that $\epsilon$ can be decreased at a polynomial cost in computing power down to a minimum error $\epsilon_\infty$. Getting below $\epsilon_\infty$ requires computing resources that increase exponentially with $\epsilon_\infty/\epsilon$. For a two dimensional array of $N=54$ qubits and a circuit with Control-Z gates of depth $D=20$, a fidelity ${\cal F}\ge 0.002$ can be reached on a single core computer in a few hours. It is remarkable that such a high fidelity can be obtained using a variational ansatz that only spans a tiny fraction $(\sim 10^{-8})$ of the full Hilbert space. Our results show how the actual computing power harvested by noisy quantum computers is controlled by the error rate $\epsilon$.
Submission history
From: Xavier Waintal [view email][v1] Tue, 18 Feb 2020 17:00:39 UTC (317 KB)
[v2] Tue, 24 Mar 2020 16:25:01 UTC (326 KB)
Current browse context:
quant-ph
Change to browse by:
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.