Nonlinear Sciences > Chaotic Dynamics
[Submitted on 26 Oct 2019 (v1), last revised 3 Jun 2020 (this version, v2)]
Title:On the risks of using double precision in numerical simulations of spatio-temporal chaos
View PDFAbstract:Due to the butterfly-effect, computer-generated chaotic simulations often deviate exponentially from the true solution, so that it is very hard to obtain a reliable simulation of chaos in a long-duration time. In this paper, a new strategy of the so-called Clean Numerical Simulation (CNS) in physical space is proposed for spatio-temporal chaos, which is computationally much more efficient than its predecessor (in spectral space). The strategy of the CNS is to reduce both of the truncation and round-off errors to a specified level by implementing high-order algorithms in multiple-precision arithmetic (with sufficient significant digits for all variables and parameters) so as to guarantee that numerical noise is below such a critical level in a temporal interval $t\in[0,T_c]$ that corresponding numerical simulation remains reliable over the whole interval. Without loss of generality, the complex Ginzburg-Landau equation (CGLE) is used to illustrate its validity. As a result, a reliable long-duration numerical simulation of the CGLE is achieved in the whole spatial domain over a long interval of time $t\in[0,3000]$, which is used as a reliable benchmark solution to investigate the influence of numerical noise by comparing it with the corresponding ones given by the 4th-order Runge-Kutta method in double precision (RKwD). Our results demonstrate that the use of double precision in simulations of chaos might lead to huge errors in the prediction of spatio-temporal trajectories and in statistics, not only quantitatively but also qualitatively, particularly in a long interval of time.
Submission history
From: Shijun Liao [view email][v1] Sat, 26 Oct 2019 02:06:10 UTC (5,567 KB)
[v2] Wed, 3 Jun 2020 09:13:50 UTC (7,973 KB)
Current browse context:
nlin.CD
Change to browse by:
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.