Skip to main content
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

Mathematics > Statistics Theory

arXiv:1906.09143 (math)
[Submitted on 21 Jun 2019]

Title:Intermediate efficiency of some weighted goodness-of-fit statistics

Authors:Bogdan Ćmiel, Tadeusz Inglot, Teresa Ledwina
View PDF
Abstract:This paper compares the Anderson-Darling and some Eicker-Jaeschke statistics to the classical unweighted Kolmogorov-Smirnov statistic. The goal is to provide a quantitative comparison of such tests and to study real possibilities of using them to detect departures from the hypothesized distribution that occur in the tails. This contribution covers the case when under the alternative a moderately large portion of probability mass is allocated towards the tails. It is demonstrated that the approach allows for tractable, analytic comparison between the given test and the benchmark, and for reliable quantitative evaluation of weighted statistics. Finite sample results illustrate the proposed approach and confirm the theoretical findings. In the course of the investigation we also prove that a slight and natural modification of the solution proposed by Borovkov and Sycheva (1968) leads to a statistic which is a member of Eicker-Jaeschke class and can be considered an attractive competitor of the very popular supremum-type Anderson-Darling statistic.
Subjects: Statistics Theory (math.ST)
Cite as: arXiv:1906.09143 [math.ST]
  (or arXiv:1906.09143v1 [math.ST] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1906.09143

Submission history

From: Bogdan Ćmiel [view email]
[v1] Fri, 21 Jun 2019 13:52:16 UTC (1,985 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
view license
Current browse context:
math.ST
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2019-06
Change to browse by:
math
stat
stat.TH

References & Citations

export BibTeX citation

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)