Astrophysics > Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics
[Submitted on 16 Apr 2019]
Title:Evolution of the mass-richness relation for the redMaPPer catalog
View PDFAbstract:The accurate determination of the galaxy cluster mass-observable relations is one of the major challenge of modern astrophysics and cosmology. We present a new statistical methodology to constrain the evolution of the mass-observable relations. Instead of measuring individual mass of galaxy clusters, we only consider large scale homogeneity of the Universe. In this case, we expect the present galaxy cluster mass function to be the same everywhere in the Universe. Using relative abundance matching, we contraint the relation between the richness, $\lambda(z)$, and the expected present mass, $M(t_0)$, of galaxy clusters. We apply this approach to the redMaPPer galaxy cluster catalogue in 10 redshift bins from $z=0.1$ to $0.6$. We found that the $\lambda(z)$-$M(t_0)$ relation is not evolving from $z=0.1$ to $0.4$, whereas it starts to significantly evolve at higher redshift. This results implies that the redMaPPer richness appears to be a better proxy for the expected present-day galaxy cluster mass than for the mass at the observational redshift. Assuming cosmology and galaxy cluster mass accretion history, it is possible to convert $M(t_0)$ to the mass at the galaxy cluster redshift $M(t_z)$. We found a significant evolution of the $\lambda(z)$-$M(t_z)$ over all the covered redshift range. Consequently, we provide a new redshift-dependent richness-mass relation for the redMaPPer galaxy cluster catalogue. This results demonstrates the efficiency of this new methodology to probe the evolution of scaling relations compared to individual galaxy cluster mass estimation.
Submission history
From: Guillaume Hurier Dr [view email][v1] Tue, 16 Apr 2019 11:54:06 UTC (110 KB)
Current browse context:
astro-ph.CO
Change to browse by:
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv Recommender
(What is IArxiv?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.