Astrophysics > Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics
[Submitted on 27 Feb 2019 (this version), latest version 11 Oct 2019 (v2)]
Title:Strongly lensed SNe Ia in the era of LSST: observing cadence for lens discoveries and time-delay measurements
View PDFAbstract:The upcoming Large Synoptic Survey Telescope (LSST) will detect many strongly lensed Type Ia supernovae (LSNe Ia) for time-delay cosmography. This will provide an independent and direct way for measuring the Hubble constant $H_0$, which is necessary to address the current $3.6 \sigma$ tension in $H_0$ between the local distance ladder and the early universe measurements. We present a detailed analysis of different observing strategies for the LSST, and quantify their impact on time-delay measurement between multiple images of LSNe Ia. For this, we simulate observations by using mock LSNe Ia for which we produce mock-LSST light curves accounting for microlensing. To measure the time delay from the simulated observations we use the free-knot splines estimator from the software PyCS. We find that using only LSST data for time-delay cosmography is not ideal. Instead, we advocate using LSST as a discovery machine for LSNe Ia, enabling time delay measurements from follow-up observations from other instruments in order to increase the number of systems by a factor of 2 to 16 depending on the observing strategy. Further, we find that LSST observing strategies which provide a good sampling frequency (mean inter-night gap around 2 days) and high cumulative season length (10 seasons with season length around 170 days) are favored. Rolling cadences subdivide the survey and focus on different parts in different years; these observing strategies trade number of seasons for better sampling frequency, which leads in our investigation to half the number of systems in comparison to the best observing strategy and therefore rolling cadences are disfavored. We anticipate that the sample of lensed SNe Ia from our preferred LSST cadence strategies with rapid follow-up observations would yield an independent percent-level constraint on $H_0$.
Submission history
From: Simon Huber [view email][v1] Wed, 27 Feb 2019 19:00:11 UTC (11,338 KB)
[v2] Fri, 11 Oct 2019 10:01:22 UTC (9,119 KB)
Current browse context:
astro-ph.IM
Change to browse by:
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv Recommender
(What is IArxiv?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.