Computer Science > Machine Learning
[Submitted on 19 Feb 2019 (this version), latest version 3 Apr 2019 (v4)]
Title:There are No Bit Parts for Sign Bits in Black-Box Attacks
View PDFAbstract:Machine learning models are vulnerable to adversarial examples. In this paper, we are concerned with black-box adversarial attacks, where only loss-oracle access to a model is available. At the heart of black-box adversarial attack is the gradient estimation problem with query complexity O(n), where n is the number of data features. Recent work has developed query-efficient gradient estimation schemes by exploiting data- and/or time-dependent priors. Practically, sign-based optimization has shown to be effective in both training deep nets as well as attacking them in a white-box setting. Therefore, instead of a gradient estimation view of black-box adversarial attacks, we view the black-box adversarial attack problem as estimating the gradient's sign bits. This shifts the view from continuous to binary black-box optimization and theoretically guarantees a lower query complexity of $\Omega(n/ \log_2(n+1))$ when given access to a Hamming loss oracle. We present three algorithms to estimate the gradient sign bits given a limited number of queries to the loss oracle. Using one of our proposed algorithms to craft black-box adversarial examples, we demonstrate evasion rate experiments on standard models trained on the MNIST, CIFAR10, and IMAGENET datasets that set new state-of-the-art results for query-efficient black-box attacks. Averaged over all the datasets and metrics, our attack fails $3.8\times$ less often and spends in total $2.5\times$ fewer queries than the current state-of-the-art attacks combined given a budget of 10,000 queries per attack attempt. On a public MNIST black-box attack challenge, our attack achieves the highest evasion rate surpassing all of the submitted attacks. Notably, our attack is hyperparameter-free (no hyperparameter tuning) and does not employ any data-/time-dependent prior, the latter fact suggesting that the number of queries can further be reduced.
Submission history
From: Abdullah Al-Dujaili [view email][v1] Tue, 19 Feb 2019 05:01:23 UTC (8,079 KB)
[v2] Wed, 27 Feb 2019 15:33:04 UTC (8,881 KB)
[v3] Thu, 14 Mar 2019 23:30:06 UTC (9,170 KB)
[v4] Wed, 3 Apr 2019 15:22:51 UTC (9,170 KB)
Current browse context:
cs.LG
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv Recommender
(What is IArxiv?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.