Computer Science > Cryptography and Security
[Submitted on 18 Feb 2019 (v1), revised 16 May 2019 (this version, v2), latest version 28 Oct 2020 (v5)]
Title:Mockingbird: Defending Against Deep-Learning-Based Website Fingerprinting Attacks with Adversarial Traces
View PDFAbstract:Website Fingerprinting (WF) is a type of traffic analysis attack that enables a local passive eavesdropper to infer the victim's activity even when the traffic is protected by encryption, a VPN, or some other anonymity system like Tor. Leveraging a deep-learning classifier, a WF attacker can gain up to 98% accuracy against Tor. Existing WF defenses are either too expensive in terms of bandwidth and latency overheads (e.g. two-to-three times as large or slow) or ineffective against the latest attacks. In this paper, we explore a novel defense, Mockingbird, based on the idea of adversarial examples that have been shown to undermine machine learning classifiers in other domains. To make the technique more robust than existing algorithms for finding adversarial examples, our approach aims to make the source trace more similar to a randomly selected target and use the neural network only to determine when the modified trace will be misclassified with high confidence. The technique drops the accuracy of the state-of-the-art attack hardened with adversarial training from 95% to between 29-57%, depending on the scenario, while incurring a reasonable 56% bandwidth overhead. The attack accuracy is generally lower than state-of-the-art defenses, and much lower when considering Top-2 accuracy, while incurring lower overheads in most settings. In addition, the information leakage of Mockingbird is at most 1.9 bits, whereas it is at most 2.2 bits for W-T and 2.6 bits for WTF-PAD.
Submission history
From: Mohammad Saidur Rahman [view email][v1] Mon, 18 Feb 2019 15:57:01 UTC (497 KB)
[v2] Thu, 16 May 2019 20:20:32 UTC (2,241 KB)
[v3] Mon, 2 Dec 2019 16:42:28 UTC (2,549 KB)
[v4] Mon, 12 Oct 2020 19:07:47 UTC (3,960 KB)
[v5] Wed, 28 Oct 2020 22:10:55 UTC (3,955 KB)
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.