Astrophysics > Astrophysics of Galaxies
[Submitted on 5 Feb 2019 (v1), last revised 9 Jul 2019 (this version, v2)]
Title:A new line on the wide binary test of gravity
View PDFAbstract:The relative velocity distribution of wide binary (WB) stars is sensitive to the law of gravity at the low accelerations typical of galactic outskirts. I consider the feasibility of this wide binary test using the `line velocity' method. This involves considering only the velocity components along the direction within the sky plane orthogonal to the systemic proper motion of each WB.
I apply this technique to the WB sample of Hernandez et. al. (2019), carefully accounting for large-angle effects at one order beyond leading. Based on Monte Carlo trials, the uncertainty in the one-dimensional velocity dispersion is $\approx 100$ m/s when using sky-projected relative velocities. Using line velocities reduces this to $\approx 30$ m/s because these are much less affected by distance uncertainties.
My analysis does not support the Hernandez et. al. (2019) claim of a clear departure from Newtonian dynamics beyond a radius of $\approx 10$ kAU, partly because I use $2\sigma$ outlier rejection to clean their sample first. Nonetheless, the uncertainties are small enough that existing WB data are nearly sufficient to distinguish Newtonian dynamics from Modified Newtonian Dynamics. I estimate that $\approx 1000$ WB systems will be required for this purpose if using only line velocities.
In addition to a larger sample, it will also be important to control for systematics like undetected companions and moving groups. This could be done statistically. The contamination can be minimized by considering a narrow theoretically motivated range of parameters and focusing on how different theories predict different proportions of WBs in this region.
Submission history
From: Indranil Banik [view email][v1] Tue, 5 Feb 2019 15:10:30 UTC (555 KB)
[v2] Tue, 9 Jul 2019 18:06:14 UTC (679 KB)
Current browse context:
astro-ph.GA
Change to browse by:
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv Recommender
(What is IArxiv?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.