Title:Can quantum mechanics be considered consistent? a discussion of Frauchinger and Renner's argument

Abstract:We discuss the argument proposed in Ref.~\cite{Frauchiger-Renner}, and show that it does not particularly illustrate any inconsistency in quantum mechanics, but rather the well known difficulty often known as the \textquotedblleft shifty split\textquotedblright: the exact point at which the von Neumann reduction postulate should be applied is ill defined. The argument of Ref.~\cite{Frauchiger-Renner} is therefore just an illustration of the original Schrödinger's cat or Wigner's friend paradoxes in another situation, and leads to the same conclusions.