Quantum Physics
[Submitted on 4 Jan 2017 (v1), last revised 6 Feb 2017 (this version, v2)]
Title:Quantum hashing is maximally secure against classical leakage
View PDFAbstract:Cryptographic hash functions are fundamental primitives widely used in practice. For such a function $f:\{0, 1\}^n\to\{0, 1\}^m$, it is nearly impossible for an adversary to produce the hash $f(x)$ without knowing the secret message $x\in\{0, 1\}^n$. Unfortunately, all hash functions are vulnerable under the side-channel attack, which is a grave concern for information security in practice. This is because typically $m\ll n$ and an adversary needs only $m$ bits of information to pass the verification test.
In sharp contrast, we show that when quantum states are used, the leakage allowed can be almost the entire secret. More precisely, we call a function that maps $n$ bits to $m$ qubits a quantum cryptographic function if the maximum fidelity between two distinct hashes is negligible in $n$. We show that for any $k=n-\omega(\log n)$, all quantum cryptographic hash functions remain cryptographically secure when leaking $k$ bits of information. By the quantum fingerprinting constructions of Buhrman et al.~({\em Phys. Rev. Lett.} 87, 167902), for all $m=\omega(\log n)$, there exist such quantum cryptographic hash functions. We also show that one only needs $\omega(\log^2 n)$ qubits to verify a quantum cryptographic hash, rather than the whole classical information needed to generate one.
Our result also shows that to approximately produce a small amount of quantum side information on a classical secret, it may require almost the full information of the secret. This large gap represents a significant barrier for proving quantum security of classical-proof extractors.
Submission history
From: Cupjin Huang [view email][v1] Wed, 4 Jan 2017 18:01:24 UTC (21 KB)
[v2] Mon, 6 Feb 2017 22:56:34 UTC (21 KB)
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.