Computer Science > Databases
[Submitted on 3 Nov 2016 (this version), latest version 18 Jul 2019 (v11)]
Title:General and Fractional Hypertree Decompositions: Hard and Easy Cases
View PDFAbstract:Hypertree decompositions, the more powerful generalized hypertree decompositions (GHDs), and the yet more general fractional hypertree decompositions (FHD) are hypergraph decomposition methods successfully used for answering conjunctive queries and for solving constraint satisfaction problems. Each hypergraph H has a width relative to each of these methods: its hypertree width hw(H), its generalized hypertree width ghw(H), and its fractional hypertree width fhw(H), respectively. While hw(H) $\leq k$ can be checked in polynomial time, the complexity of checking whether fhw(H) $\leq k$ holds for a fixed constant $k$ was unknown and was stated by Grohe and Marx (SODA 2006) as an important open problem. We settle this problem by proving that checking whether fhw(H) $\leq k$ is NP-complete, even for $k=2$ and by same construction also the problem deciding whether ghw(H) $\leq k$ is NP-complete for $k \geq 2$. Hardness was previously known for $k \geq 3$, whilst the case $k=2$ has remained open since 2001.
After proving these hardness results, we investigate meaningful restrictions, for which checking for bounded ghw is easy. We study classes of hypergraphs that enjoy the bounded edge-intersection property (BIP) and the more general bounded multi-edge intersection property (BMIP). For such classes, for each constant $k$, checking whether ghw(H) $\leq k$, and if so, computing a GHD of width $k$ of H is tractable and actually FPT. Finally we derive some approximability results for fhw. We consider classes of hypergraphs whose fhw is bounded by a constant $k$ and which also enjoy the BIP or MIP, or bounded VC-dimension. For each hypergraph in such a class, we are able to compute an FHD of width O($k$ log $k$) efficiently. A different restriction on classes of hypergraphs gives a linear approximation in PTime. Hypergraphs of bounded rank are a simple example of such a class.
Submission history
From: Wolfgang Fischl [view email][v1] Thu, 3 Nov 2016 16:54:37 UTC (409 KB)
[v2] Thu, 24 Nov 2016 17:48:37 UTC (409 KB)
[v3] Tue, 29 Nov 2016 14:49:35 UTC (412 KB)
[v4] Thu, 22 Dec 2016 11:26:00 UTC (412 KB)
[v5] Fri, 23 Jun 2017 08:55:29 UTC (103 KB)
[v6] Mon, 28 Aug 2017 09:29:25 UTC (104 KB)
[v7] Tue, 29 Aug 2017 11:13:24 UTC (104 KB)
[v8] Wed, 25 Jul 2018 14:20:36 UTC (105 KB)
[v9] Tue, 20 Nov 2018 10:50:34 UTC (123 KB)
[v10] Tue, 21 May 2019 08:22:25 UTC (123 KB)
[v11] Thu, 18 Jul 2019 11:38:17 UTC (124 KB)
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.