Skip to main content
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

Computer Science > Digital Libraries

arXiv:1609.04793 (cs)
[Submitted on 15 Sep 2016 (v1), last revised 23 Sep 2016 (this version, v3)]

Title:Professional and Citizen Bibliometrics: Complementarities and ambivalences in the development and use of indicators

Authors:Loet Leydesdorff, Paul Wouters, Lutz Bornmann
View PDF
Abstract:Bibliometric indicators such as journal impact factors, h-indices, and total citation counts are algorithmic artifacts that can be used in research evaluation and management. These artifacts have no meaning by themselves, but receive their meaning from attributions in institutional practices. We distinguish four main stakeholders in these practices: (1) producers of bibliometric data and indicators; (2) bibliometricians who develop and test indicators; (3) research managers who apply the indicators; and (4) the scientists being evaluated with potentially competing career interests. These different positions may lead to different and sometimes conflicting perspectives on the meaning and value of the indicators. The indicators can thus be considered as boundary objects which are socially constructed in translations among these perspectives. This paper proposes an analytical clarification by listing an informed set of (sometimes unsolved) problems in bibliometrics which can also shed light on the tension between simple but invalid indicators that are widely used (e.g., the h-index) and more sophisticated indicators that are not used or cannot be used in evaluation practices because they are not transparent for users, cannot be calculated, or are difficult to interpret.
Comments: Scientometrics (in press)
Subjects: Digital Libraries (cs.DL)
Cite as: arXiv:1609.04793 [cs.DL]
  (or arXiv:1609.04793v3 [cs.DL] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1609.04793

Submission history

From: Loet Leydesdorff [view email]
[v1] Thu, 15 Sep 2016 19:33:39 UTC (920 KB)
[v2] Fri, 16 Sep 2016 09:42:48 UTC (923 KB)
[v3] Fri, 23 Sep 2016 12:16:58 UTC (920 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

  • View PDF
  • Other Formats
view license
Current browse context:
cs.DL
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2016-09
Change to browse by:
cs

References & Citations

DBLP - CS Bibliography

listing | bibtex
Loet Leydesdorff
Paul Wouters
Lutz Bornmann
export BibTeX citation

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)