High Energy Physics - Phenomenology
[Submitted on 31 Dec 2015 (v1), last revised 21 Mar 2016 (this version, v3)]
Title:New Physics Patterns in $\varepsilon^\prime/\varepsilon$ and $\varepsilon_K$ with Implications for Rare Kaon Decays and $ΔM_K$
View PDFAbstract:The SM prediction for the ratio $\varepsilon^\prime/\varepsilon$ appears to be significantly below the experimental data. Also $\varepsilon_K$ in the SM tends to be below the data. Any NP removing these anomalies will first of all have impact on flavour observables in the $K$ meson system, in particular on rare $K$ decays and $\Delta M_K$. Restricting the operators contributing to $\varepsilon^\prime/\varepsilon$ to the SM ones and to the corresponding primed operators, NP contributions are quite generally dominated either by QCD penguin (QCDP) operators $Q_6(Q_6^\prime)$ or electroweak penguin (EWP) operators $Q_8(Q_8^\prime)$ with rather different implications for other flavour observables. We discuss general models with tree-level $Z$ and $Z^\prime$ flavour violating exchanges and few specific models. We find that simultaneous enhancements of $\varepsilon^\prime/\varepsilon$, $\varepsilon_K$, $\mathcal{B}(K_L\to\pi^0\nu\bar\nu)$ and $\mathcal{B}(K^+\to\pi^+\nu\bar\nu)$ in $Z$ scenarios are only possible in the presence of both LH and RH flavour-violating couplings. In $Z^\prime$ scenarios this is not required but the size of NP effects and the correlation between $\mathcal{B}(K_L\to\pi^0\nu\bar\nu)$ and $\mathcal{B}(K^+\to\pi^+\nu\bar\nu)$ depends strongly on whether QCDP or EWP dominate NP contributions to $\varepsilon^\prime/\varepsilon$. In the QCDP case possible enhancements of both branching ratios are much larger than for EWP scenario and take place only on the branch parallel to the Grossman-Nir bound, which is in the case of EWP dominance only possible in the absence of NP in $\varepsilon_K$. QCDP and EWP scenarios of NP in $\varepsilon^\prime/\varepsilon$ can also be uniquely distinguished by the size and the sign of NP contribution to $\Delta M_K$, elevating the importance of the precise calculation of $\Delta M_K$ in the SM.
Submission history
From: Andrzej Buras [view email][v1] Thu, 31 Dec 2015 21:00:04 UTC (157 KB)
[v2] Mon, 25 Jan 2016 15:25:47 UTC (160 KB)
[v3] Mon, 21 Mar 2016 08:42:20 UTC (160 KB)
Current browse context:
hep-ph
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv Recommender
(What is IArxiv?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.