Mathematics > Probability
[Submitted on 10 Nov 2015 (v1), last revised 19 Nov 2020 (this version, v3)]
Title:A service system with packing constraints: Greedy randomized algorithm achieving sublinear in scale optimality gap
View PDFAbstract:A service system with multiple types of arriving customers is considered. There is an infinite number of homogeneous servers. Multiple customers can be placed for simultaneous service into one server, subject to general packing constraints. Each new arriving customer is placed for service immediately, either into an occupied server, as long as packing constraints are not violated, or into an empty server. After service completion, each customer leaves its server and the system. The basic objective is to minimize the number of occupied servers in steady state. We study a Greedy-Random (GRAND) placement (packing) algorithm, introduced in [23]. This is a simple online algorithm, which places each arriving customer uniformly at random into either one of the already occupied servers that can still fit the customer, or one of the so-called zero-servers, which are empty servers designated to be available to new arrivals. In [23], a version of the algorithm, labeled GRAND($aZ$), was considered, where the number of zero servers is $aZ$, with $Z$ being the current total number of customers in the system, and $a>0$ being an algorithm parameter. GRAND($aZ$) was shown in [23] to be asymptotically optimal in the following sense: (a) the steady-state optimality gap grows linearly in the system scale $r$ (the mean total number of customers in service), i.e. as $c(a) r$ for some $c(a)> 0$; and (b) $c(a) \to 0$ as $a\to 0$. In this paper, we consider the GRAND($Z^p$) algorithm, in which the number of zero-servers is $Z^p$, where $p \in (1-1/(8\kappa),1)$ is an algorithm parameter, and $(\kappa-1)$ is the maximum possible number of customers that a server can fit. We prove the asymptotic optimality of GRAND($Z^p$) in the sense that the steady-state optimality gap is $o(r)$, sublinear in the system scale. This is a stronger form of asymptotic optimality than that of GRAND($aZ$).
Submission history
From: Alexander Stolyar [view email][v1] Tue, 10 Nov 2015 19:57:52 UTC (37 KB)
[v2] Sat, 24 Mar 2018 17:02:59 UTC (39 KB)
[v3] Thu, 19 Nov 2020 19:36:25 UTC (40 KB)
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.