Computer Science > Information Theory
[Submitted on 30 May 2014 (v1), last revised 20 Apr 2016 (this version, v3)]
Title:Error Decay of (almost) Consistent Signal Estimations from Quantized Gaussian Random Projections
View PDFAbstract:This paper provides new error bounds on "consistent" reconstruction methods for signals observed from quantized random projections. Those signal estimation techniques guarantee a perfect matching between the available quantized data and a new observation of the estimated signal under the same sensing model. Focusing on dithered uniform scalar quantization of resolution $\delta>0$, we prove first that, given a Gaussian random frame of $\mathbb R^N$ with $M$ vectors, the worst-case $\ell_2$-error of consistent signal reconstruction decays with high probability as $O(\frac{N}{M}\log\frac{M}{\sqrt N})$ uniformly for all signals of the unit ball $\mathbb B^N \subset \mathbb R^N$. Up to a log factor, this matches a known lower bound in $\Omega(N/M)$ and former empirical validations in $O(N/M)$. Equivalently, if $M$ exceeds a minimal number of frame coefficients growing like $O(\frac{N}{\epsilon_0}\log \frac{\sqrt
N}{\epsilon_0})$, any vectors in $\mathbb B^N$ with $M$ identical quantized projections are at most $\epsilon_0$ apart with high probability. Second, in the context of Quantized Compressed Sensing with $M$ Gaussian random measurements and under the same scalar quantization scheme, consistent reconstructions of $K$-sparse signals of $\mathbb R^N$ have a worst-case error that decreases with high probability as $O(\tfrac{K}{M}\log\tfrac{MN}{\sqrt K^3})$ uniformly for all such signals. Finally, we show that the proximity of vectors whose quantized random projections are only approximately consistent can still be bounded with high probability. A certain level of corruption is thus allowed in the quantization process, up to the appearance of a systematic bias in the reconstruction error of (almost) consistent signal estimates.
Submission history
From: Laurent Jacques [view email][v1] Fri, 30 May 2014 21:44:18 UTC (52 KB)
[v2] Tue, 23 Jun 2015 12:16:34 UTC (59 KB)
[v3] Wed, 20 Apr 2016 08:15:32 UTC (60 KB)
Current browse context:
math.IT
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.