Title:Contrary Inferences in Consistent Histories and a Set Selection Criterion

Abstract:The best developed formulation of quantum theory for a closed system that handles multiple-time statements is the consistent (or decoherent) histories approach. One of the weaknesses of the approach is that it gives rise to many different consistent sets, and it has been argued that a complete interpretation should be accompanied with a natural mechanism leading to a (possibly) unique preferred consistent set. What makes even more problematic the existence of multiple consistent sets, is that it allows for the existence of contrary inferences (Kent 1997). We analyse the conceptual difficulties that arise from the existence of multiple consistent sets and provide a suggestion for a natural set selection criterion. This criterion does not lead to a unique physical consistent set, however it evades the existence of consistent sets with contrary inferences. The criterion is based on the concept of preclusion and the requirement that probability one propositions and their inferences should be non-contextual. It is also compatible with the ontology of coevents, which is an alternative histories based formulation.