Skip to main content
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

Physics > Physics and Society

arXiv:1312.3986 (physics)
[Submitted on 14 Dec 2013 (v1), last revised 16 Jan 2014 (this version, v3)]

Title:Correlations between user voting data, budget, and box office for films in the Internet Movie Database

Authors:Max Wasserman, Satyam Mukherjee, Konner Scott, Xiao Han T. Zeng, Filippo Radicchi, Luís A.N. Amaral
View PDF
Abstract:The Internet Movie Database (IMDb) is one of the most-visited websites in the world and the premier source for information on films. Like Wikipedia, much of IMDb's information is user contributed. IMDb also allows users to voice their opinion on the quality of films through voting. We investigate whether there is a connection between this user voting data and certain economic film characteristics. To this end, we perform distribution and correlation analysis on a set of films chosen to mitigate effects of bias due to the language and country of origin of films. We show that production budget, box office gross, and total number of user votes for films are consistent with double-log normal distributions for certain time periods. Both total gross and user votes are consistent with a double-log normal distribution from the late 1980s onward, while for budget, it extends from 1935 to 1979. In addition, we find a strong correlation between number of user votes and the economic statistics, particularly budget. Remarkably, we find no evidence for a correlation between number of votes and average user rating. As previous studies have found a strong correlation between production budget and marketing expenses, our results suggest that total user votes is an indicator of a film's prominence or notability, which can be quantified by its promotional costs.
Comments: 14 pages, 8 figures, 3 tables, accepted for publication to JASIST
Subjects: Physics and Society (physics.soc-ph); Social and Information Networks (cs.SI)
Cite as: arXiv:1312.3986 [physics.soc-ph]
  (or arXiv:1312.3986v3 [physics.soc-ph] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1312.3986

Submission history

From: Max Wasserman [view email]
[v1] Sat, 14 Dec 2013 00:18:03 UTC (1,560 KB)
[v2] Fri, 10 Jan 2014 20:20:59 UTC (1,560 KB)
[v3] Thu, 16 Jan 2014 21:09:26 UTC (1,560 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
view license
Current browse context:
physics.soc-ph
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2013-12
Change to browse by:
cs
cs.SI
physics

References & Citations

export BibTeX citation

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)