Skip to main content
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

Quantum Physics

arXiv:1308.5031 (quant-ph)
[Submitted on 23 Aug 2013 (v1), last revised 14 Nov 2013 (this version, v2)]

Title:Analysis of a proposal for a realistic loophole-free Bell test with atom-light entanglement

Authors:Colin Teo, Jiří Minář, Daniel Cavalcanti, Valerio Scarani
View PDF
Abstract:The violation of Bell inequalities where both detection and locality loopholes are closed is crucial for device independent assessments of quantum information. While of technological nature, the simultaneous closing of both loopholes still remains a challenge. In Nat. Commun. 4:2104(2013), a realistic setup to produce an atom-photon entangled state that could reach a loophole free Bell inequality violation within current experimental technology was proposed. Here we improve the analysis of this proposal by giving an analytical treatment that shows that the state proposed in Nat. Commun. 4:2104(2013) could in principle violate a Bell inequality for arbitrarily low photodetection efficiency. Moreover, it is also able to violate a Bell inequality considering only atomic and homodyne measurements eliminating the need to consider inefficient photocounting measurements. In this case, the maximum Clauser-Horne-Shimony-Holt (CHSH) inequality violation achievable is 2.29, and the minimum transmission required for violation is about 68%. Finally, we show that by postselecting on an atomic measurement, one can engineer superpositions of coherent states for various coherent state amplitudes.
Comments: 7 pages, 6 figures, to appear in Phys. Rev. A
Subjects: Quantum Physics (quant-ph)
Cite as: arXiv:1308.5031 [quant-ph]
  (or arXiv:1308.5031v2 [quant-ph] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1308.5031
Journal reference: Phys. Rev. A 88, 053848 (2013)
Related DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.88.053848

Submission history

From: Colin Teo [view email]
[v1] Fri, 23 Aug 2013 02:56:49 UTC (27 KB)
[v2] Thu, 14 Nov 2013 07:41:57 UTC (310 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
view license
Current browse context:
quant-ph
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2013-08

References & Citations

export BibTeX citation

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)