Title:Rings That Are Morita Equivalent to Their Opposites

Abstract:We consider the following problem suggested by D.\ Saltman: Under what assumptions do one or more of the following are equivalent for a ring $R$: (A) $R$ is Morita equivalent to a ring with involution, (B) $R$ is Morita equivalent to a ring with an anti-automorphism, (C) $R$ is Morita equivalent to its opposite ring. We show that (C)==>(B) provided $R$ is semilocal or $\Q$-finite as well as other results of similar flavor. In contrast to that, we demonstrate that (B)=\=>(A), even where $R$ is a finite dimensional algebra over a field. Our methods give a new perspective on the Knus-Parimala-Srinivas proof of a theorem of D. Saltman, which state precisely when an Azumaya $C$-algebra $A$ is Brauer equivalent to an Azumaya $C$-algebra $B$ with an involution whose restriction to $C$ is a prescribed Galois automorphism $\sigma\in\Aut(C)$. Our proofs use the recently introduced general bilinear forms to construct involutions and anti-automorphisms.