Computer Science > Networking and Internet Architecture
[Submitted on 4 Feb 2013 (this version), latest version 19 Jun 2014 (v3)]
Title:Probe Scheduling for Efficient Detection of Silent Failures
View PDFAbstract:Most discovery systems for silent failures work in two phases: a continuous monitoring phase that detects presence of failures and a localization phase that identifies the faulty element(s). This separation is important because localization requires more significant resources than detection and should be initiated only when a fault is present.
Detection, which we focus on, uses a schedule of probe packets. We propose ways to improve the system efficiency by addressing both the selection of appropriate objectives for detection time, based on costs associated with particular failures, and the efficient design of schedules, which satisfy objectives with minimum probing overhead. Our work unifies the treatment of SUM and MAX objectives and of stochastic and deterministic schedules and allows us to compare and relate these alternatives.
We define {\em memoryless schedules} -- a subclass of stochastic schedules which is simple and suitable for distributed deployment. We show that optimal memorlyess schedules can be efficiently computed by convex programs (for SUM objectives) or linear programs (for MAX objectives), and surprisingly perhaps, are guaranteed to have expected detection times that are not too far off the (NP hard) stochastic optima.
Deterministic schedules allow us to bound the maximum (rather than expected) cost of undetected faults, but like stochastic schedules, are NP hard to optimize. We propose novel efficient deterministic schedulers with analytic performance guarantees and simulate them on real networks. By relating performance to the computed memoryless optima, we can see that on many instances, our deterministic schedules are nearly optimal.
Submission history
From: Edith Cohen [view email][v1] Mon, 4 Feb 2013 18:43:50 UTC (115 KB)
[v2] Sun, 16 Jun 2013 06:51:12 UTC (141 KB)
[v3] Thu, 19 Jun 2014 08:52:07 UTC (130 KB)
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.