Skip to main content
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

Physics > General Physics

arXiv:1201.3205v3 (physics)
[Submitted on 16 Jan 2012 (v1), revised 16 May 2012 (this version, v3), latest version 28 Oct 2022 (v6)]

Title:Two Different Formulations of Doppler Effect under Classical Physics

Authors:Chandru Iyer
View PDF
Abstract:It is normally stated that classical physics does not predict a transverse Doppler effect. We show that classical physics predicts two types of Doppler effects, one when the speed of light is c with respect to the inertial frame co-moving with the source and the other when the speed of light is c with respect to the inertial frame co-moving with the receptor. Classical physics does predict a transverse Doppler effect when the speed of light is c with respect to the inertial frame co-moving with the source. In both longitudinal and transverse cases, we show that the Doppler effect predicted by relativity theory is the geometric mean of the two predictions of the classical theory. We further show that for all angles of emission and receipt the ratio of the three quantities - "Doppler effect predicted by classical theory with speed of light as c with respect to source" : "Doppler effect predicted by relativity theory" : "Doppler effect predicted by classical theory with speed of light as c with respect to receptor" remains (1/gamma):1:gamma for all angles of emission and receipt.
Comments: Section V added on May 16, 2012, proving the contention for arbitrary angles of emission and receipt. version V3
Subjects: General Physics (physics.gen-ph)
Cite as: arXiv:1201.3205 [physics.gen-ph]
  (or arXiv:1201.3205v3 [physics.gen-ph] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1201.3205

Submission history

From: Chandru Iyer [view email]
[v1] Mon, 16 Jan 2012 10:37:14 UTC (155 KB)
[v2] Tue, 17 Jan 2012 07:15:51 UTC (157 KB)
[v3] Wed, 16 May 2012 09:50:12 UTC (185 KB)
[v4] Thu, 17 May 2012 11:50:29 UTC (185 KB)
[v5] Fri, 9 Aug 2013 12:16:03 UTC (757 KB)
[v6] Fri, 28 Oct 2022 08:09:48 UTC (776 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

  • View PDF
  • Other Formats
view license
Current browse context:
physics.gen-ph
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2012-01
Change to browse by:
physics

References & Citations

export BibTeX citation

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)