Skip to main content
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

Computer Science > Computers and Society

arXiv:0911.3558 (cs)
[Submitted on 18 Nov 2009]

Title:A Meta-evaluation of Scientific Research Proposals: Different Ways of Comparing Rejected to Awarded Applications

Authors:Lutz Bornmann, Loet Leydesdorff, Peter van den Besselaar
View PDF
Abstract: Combining different data sets with information on grant and fellowship applications submitted to two renowned funding agencies, we are able to compare their funding decisions (award and rejection) with scientometric performance indicators across two fields of science (life sciences and social sciences). The data sets involve 671 applications in social sciences and 668 applications in life sciences. In both fields, awarded applicants perform on average better than all rejected applicants. If only the most preeminent rejected applicants are considered in both fields, they score better than the awardees on citation impact. With regard to productivity we find differences between the fields: While the awardees in life sciences outperform on average the most preeminent rejected applicants, the situation is reversed in social sciences.
Subjects: Computers and Society (cs.CY); Physics and Society (physics.soc-ph)
Cite as: arXiv:0911.3558 [cs.CY]
  (or arXiv:0911.3558v1 [cs.CY] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.0911.3558

Submission history

From: Loet Leydesdorff [view email]
[v1] Wed, 18 Nov 2009 14:41:41 UTC (160 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

  • View PDF
  • Other Formats
view license
Current browse context:
cs.CY
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2009-11
Change to browse by:
cs
physics
physics.soc-ph

References & Citations

DBLP - CS Bibliography

listing | bibtex
Lutz Bornmann
Loet Leydesdorff
Peter van den Besselaar
export BibTeX citation

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)